• Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    So what you’re saying is if Bob tells me (your name) has a flying tiger, and I later find out you don’t have a flying tiger… you no longer exists?

    Hate religion all you want but don’t shit on history. In all likelihood there was a Jesus the story is based off of. Who was probably real. We have lots of non religious documents that mention him. The Quran mentions him. He probably existed as a person.

    Like you exist as a person even though you don’t have a flying tiger.

    Militant atheists are just as problematic as religious zealots.

    Both annoying, pushy, and insisting you’re way is the only way. Everyone else is damned.

    It’s the same playbook lol.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Militant atheists are just as problematic as religious zealots.

      Lol

      Trying to be the enlightened centrist and saying this. Show me the genocides being committed currently in the name of atheism.

      I dont particularly care, I have religious friends but come on.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and Enver Hoxha

        Pick up a book every once I a while.

        Religion isn’t the root of all evil lol. People have been killed in the name of aithism, capitalism, science, expansion, gold, resources and yes sometimes religion. It’s not like religion is the big thing we go to war over.

        We are at war with Iran right now and religion has nothing to do with it at all.

        • DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          So i don’t really want to read for this subject but i like conversation. Not trying to facetious.

          Did Stalin, Zedong, etc really kill because of atheistic principles? Or more politically?

          • Aeao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Dude! You should’ve said that from the beginning! I’m a reasonable person too who just likes to talk!

            Stalin killed arguabley for aithiesm. He definitely killed people for thier beliefs….

            But I understand your question “did they kill for aithiesm (why can’t I spell that lol)”

            No…. But if you acknowledge nopolean of France wasn’t killing people FOR aithiesm. You also have to admit no one was fighting the crusades to actually protect the holly land.

            He’ll Donald trump and his followers say he was appointed by Jesus and practically worship him. Does that make the Iran conflict a holy war?

            No religion doesn’t have anything to due with it.

            I’ve been drinking so go easy and assume I meant things in good faith

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So what you’re saying is if Bob tells me (your name) has a flying tiger, and I later find out you don’t have a flying tiger… you no longer exists?

      They did not say someone named Jesus did not exist.

      There’s a difference between believing “Joe who had a tiger and a bear and an elephant”, and assuming that there might have been 3 different Joe’s, one with a tiger, one with a bear and one with an elephant, each of them in a different period. Saying “Joe with 3 animals did not exist” does not imply that those Joe’s did not exist.

      I’m not a historian but what I’ve heard (must have been on Alex O’Connor’s podcast) is that even some of the possible historical Jesuses (or “Jesusi” :D) had things going on that were not compatible with what the biblical Jesus was all about. (Such as being cult leader proclaiming that world will end in few years.)

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        He said Jesus is a fictional figure. He probably existed and yes there were more than one person with similar but that doesn’t change my argument.

        If you say “this is Bob and he has a tiger” and I find out he does not have a tiger… he still exists as a person.

        But you say “the stories about Bob don’t line up with any specific Bob”

        Okay, that doesn’t stop Bob from being just because someone got a story wrong.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          now you are just talking about some different guy named bob.

          mario is based on a person, but mario is a fictional character

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              people exist, plumbers exist, people named mario exist, is there a plumber that can grow twice his size, shot fireballs using a flower, can jump four times his height unassisted, or fights a giant sentient reptile that breaths fire? no.

              you can argue jesus was a man, but he is not the jesus of the bible.

              • Aeao@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Right so Jesus existed . Glad we agree.

                The way I see it is I said “Jesus at the very least existed and was vocal enough to be mentioned “

                You’re argument is stomping your feet and saying “but that wasn’t YOUR Jesus so you are wrong”

                It’s sounds really pathetic hearing you two try to disprove my idea of Jesus doesn’t exist when you haven’t even ask who I think Jesus was lol.

                You don’t even know what my argument is you just know I’m wrong lol. Pathetic.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So you say non religious stuff mention him then mention the Quran. Yep good argument there.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’ll notice the Quran was said separately from the other stuff. I separated the two because it’s a religious book but not the Bible.