In a nutshell: As Microsoft prepares to end free security updates for Windows 10 in October, a significant challenge looms for charities that refurbish and distribute older computers to those in need. With an estimated 240 million PCs unable to meet the stringent hardware requirements for Windows 11, these organizations face a difficult decision: provide potentially insecure Windows 10 systems, send them to e-waste recyclers, or explore alternative operating systems like Linux.

Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, Secure Boot capability, and TPM 2.0 compatibility. However, the supported Intel CPU list only goes back to 8th Gen chips, introduced in 2017, while the AMD list includes Ryzen 2000 series and above.

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    how is this a hard choice? windows will keep ratcheting to shit. it will not improve. the question is: linux now, or tons of expense and trouble, and linux later?

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      The choice is hard because many charities already have a hard time maintaining what they have. To move to linux, they’d need people to know linux. Many volunteers that support this stuff simply don’t and are barely power-users themselves. I spend a good chunk of my day interacting with JUST windows users who have no idea how a computer actually works… they just know how to barely operate windows.

      • horrorslice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I would also like to mention the situation of printers. I can get my office printer working on chromeOS, Windows, Mac, but no Linux distro (other than chromeOS) wanted to play nice with it.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        okay but windows will at some point become unusable. that’s not a question, that WILL happen. I already find it frustrating.

        so do you rip off the band-aid, or spend a bunch of money to let the wound keep festering, then have to rip off the band-aid even worse later?

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          okay but windows will at some point become unusable.

          Why would windows 10 magically become unusable? It’s not like Microsoft is going to send out a firmware brick at the EoL.

          You know that you can still install XP today and get online… With minimal work you can actually get online completely on modern sites.

          The same could be said for any linux distro.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            not like microsoft is going to send out a firmware brick at the EoL

            I don’t expect it, but I would only be slightly surprised.

            can still install XP today

            yes. windows xp was a fully local OS, and when you installed it, you stilled owned your computer. these things are not true of windows 10.

            the same could be said for any linux distro

            sure, and I could say you’re a chainsaw juggling pedophile lizard person who came from the future to make sure flavored foams don’t have a resurgence in upscale dining at any cost because the consequences, drawn out 200 years, are so much worse than fascism and several possible extinction events. saying shit is easy. doesn’t make it true.

            …does it? do you need a heated rock?

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              yes. windows xp was a fully local OS, and when you installed it, you stilled owned your computer. these things are not true of windows 10.

              Yes you can? It’s windows 11 that tries to lock you out, and even then you can install it without internet if you know the magic incantation…

              But windows 10 will just install with a local account if you don’t give it internet (unplug ethernet and never setup a wifi).

              sure, and I could say you’re a chainsaw juggling pedophile lizard person who came from the future to make sure flavored foams don’t have a resurgence in upscale dining at any cost because the consequences, drawn out 200 years, are so much worse than fascism and several possible extinction events. saying shit is easy. doesn’t make it true.

              The fuck? Any linux install will eventually become unsupported. That is my claim to counter your nonsense claim of Windows becoming unusable.

              Go take your pills.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                nuh uh! there’s a hacked version that can do that!

                could say the same about literally any software.

                the fuck

                I mean, i proved that I could say it. and proved how little impact saying it had upon the facts. whether or not you’re a chainsaw juggling pedophile lizard-person from the future, here to save us from unfortunate upscale dining trends. you either were or you weren’t, and me saying it changed nothing.

                any linux install will

                they update pretty cleanly without anti-features. it’s just a version numbering thing, dude. im sure there’s some old hardware that’s been dropped, but I’m running some pretty out-there linux installs on pre-2010 hardware with no difficulty.

      • underfreyja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s a barrier of entry to linux for sure BUT it really depends on the distro.

        The issue I think is “marketing”. I’m sure most of these computer agnostic folks would be fine using Linux Mint or Ubuntu but to someone who doesn’t understand these things, just the fact that there’s a choice to make there is probably barrier enough.

        If we lower the barrier of entry for installation and choice for them, the decision to switch becomes way easier, I think.

  • Stefen Auris@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it should be viewed as a trade-off. If you want cheaper refurbished PCs you’ll have to tolerate adjusting to Linux. If you want to deal with Microsoft you’ll have to pay for it: Licensing and new hardware and all.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      So, the question becomes: does a particular charity have a shortage of tech people working for them or a shortage of money? Which would be easier to get?

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      My 10yo netbook runs the latest Debian Linux. If it was running on its original OS (XP) it would not only crawl but be dangerously vulnerable.

      • franticdisembowel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wow, pretty unbelievable a netbook was still being sold with XP in 2015 lol. How’d you come about getting that?

    • Australis13@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Precisely what I am doing. Too many devices that still do what I need simply to ditch just because Windows 10 is EOL. I’m a bit over half-way in my migration (still have a few programs to sort out - may have to run a W10 VM for a couple of them as they don’t work under WINE and there is no Linux equivalent).

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      My desktop is a 2012 lenovo office machine. Fresh SSD, wifi card, and an… OK graphics card have had the thing purring for me since 2018.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What if the SSD and everything else are 9 years old? Is that worth risking data loss over?

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        With the age of those computers you might even be looking at a HDD. Those should definitely be replaced, SSDs, it depends.

        In any case a new 128G SDD is on the order of 15 bucks, well worth the investment even for an age-old system (unless you have a bit more extra cash because the GB/buck optimum is in the 0.5-2T range).

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage,

    All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

    Secure Boot capability, and TPM 2.0 compatibility.

    This is the problem right here. Pretty much every last computer you hear about that isn’t compatible it’s one or both of these, almost always the TPM 2.0 module.

    That of course is if the reason you aren’t “upgrading” is because the hardware isn’t supported. For a great many of us our hardware is supported, we just don’t want all the bullshit anti-features Microsoft has crammed into Windows 11. Windows 10 was already bad enough with it’s constant telemetry spyware, that annoying Cortana garbage shoehorned in anywhere they could manage, the absolute atrocity that they turned the start menu search function into, and the annoying Teams and OneDrive integrations that randomly reinstalled and re-enabled themselves after updates.

    Then MS went and had to cram in even more spyware by way of their horrible copilot garbage. All for what? What are we getting with 11 that’s better than 10? What feature justifies that upgrade? Nothing, that’s the answer. There’s no reason at all that 11 needed to be made.

    • lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Microsoft’s requirements for Windows 11 include a 1GHz or faster CPU with at least two cores, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage,

      All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

      IDK about you, but the Pentium 4 is not an ideal CPU for modern workloads. The absolute oldest hardware I would use today for anything is the Core2Duo with 8GB RAM. I know this because we have an A1276 MacBook Pro with the P8600 C2D, and it’s barely sufficient. You look at it and the cooling fan begins a launch sequence 😅 and that’s running Linux Mint. Windows 10/11 would grind it to a halt trying to run multiple tasks.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Windows 10 actually ran ok with all the aero effects turned off on my Mac mini core2duo T7600 & 3.25gb ram, wish I could have gotten 64 bit running though.

    • Lippy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      All of this is no problem and essentially any computer manufactured in the last couple decades can meet these requirements. They’re effectively irrelevant for this discussion.

      Not quite. Windows 11 requires an Intel 8th gen or AMD Zen+ CPU or newer, with some odd exceptions. I’ve dealt with some machines that only fail on the CPU check and can confirm that Windows 11 will refuse to install without bypassing those arbitrary ‘requirements’.

      I do agree with the rest of your post though.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    IMHO each new version of Windows looks & feels different to the last anyway, so most (general users) wouldn’t know the difference - they just need a web browser an email client and an office suite.

    That 1 Windows-only program they use is probably not compatible with the next version of Windows too

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      That 1 Windows-only program they use is probably not compatible with the next version of Windows too

      No it probably is, Microsoft puts a ton of effort into backwards compatibility

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah a lot of problems with Windows can actually be explained by some kind of backwards compatibility lol

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you’re buying a PC that doesn’t have the specs to run Windows 11, you’re probably only using it for web browsing tasks anyway. I’d wager that many of them wouldn’t even notice that they’re using a different OS.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      My old PC has the horsepower to run 11. I even forced it on there. I got a tpm module too. But the cpu itself isn’t officially supported, even though it’s a i7 5930K with 6 cores and 12 threads @4 GHz.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      My PC isn’t compatible with Windows 11.

      I cobbled it together from spare parts as my wife has upgraded over the years. It was a pretty beefy computer when she first built it, and it’s gotten a couple upgrades along the way, but the CPU and MoBo are probably about 10 years old if not older (it’s an AMD FX-something, I’m unsure of the exact specs, it’s whatever parts were in her bin of cast-offs stuck with a new case and hard drive)

      And I’m happily gaming on it. I may not be maxing out the latest AAA titles in glorious 8k epic quality 120hz HDR VR yadda yadda yadda, but I can still run pretty much any game out there on some acceptable mid-to-high quality settings and decent performance.

      I’m probably going to have to either upgrade the MoBo and processor come October, or make the jump to Linux (which I’m not exactly opposed to, but I do like not having to fuck with wine and proton to run my games)

      It’s a perfectly serviceable board, still doing just fine by me, and there’s no reason it can’t give someone at least a few more good years of use, even as a gaming computer if you’re not a graphics snob.

      But if I decide to upgrade, unless I find someone who wants to run Linux on it, or understands the risk of running win10 with no security updates, it’s probably going to become e waste.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, steam has definitely done a lot to improve the situation and I’m very impressed with the current state of things.

          I just have a bit of a mental block from the last time I seriously tried to use Linux (circa 2009 probably) that I need to get over. A lot has changed since then

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            My last go-around with Linux gaming was pre-steam deck. I think it ended around 2018ish? So it’s been long enough I should probably give Linux a real try again sometime

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Hey if you’re in the states, I ended up with a pallet of PCs from an auction I didn’t expect to win and my wife would be happy to see one more disappear, so if you want to cover shipping I’d be happy to send it off to ya. They’re just HP Elitedesk SFFs with 4th gen i5s, but there’s a bunch of half-height PCIe slots and 3.5" bays and even a DVD drive so plenty of expandability to get yourself into trouble with

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lol, I’ll keep that in mind, internet stranger. I do have a lot of techy friends who I’ll probably offer it up to first, and I haven’t quite ruled out running Linux myself either to keep as my main PC or to use as a media server or something, but I’ll keep you in mind if I’m looking to get rid of it in a few months.

          If it does come to that, pay for shipping (or pick it up if you happen to be local) and it’s yours. Feel free to hit me up to ask about it come november-ish if I don’t reach out first. No guarantees it will be available, but I’d rather it go to someone who’s going to use it than be waste

    • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been planning on selling a couple older laptops (Latitude E6420 and ThinkPad X240) and this is a fantastic idea. The former laptop doesn’t even have Windows 10 drivers (that I know of)

      • ChogChog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The ThinkPads are great. I have an X220 that I have running Mint that I use in my garage. Its use cases are music streaming, displaying PDF Service Manuals/Technical Diagrams, and web queries for random questions/video instructions. I’m working on trying to see if I can get Wine to let me run some diagnostic software on it too.

        It can certainly do more than that as I used it through school a number of years ago for note taking and small programming projects. But it’s retired to being the tank that it is and it’s amazing for that.

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I totally agree, they’re mad little machines. I’m only selling mine because I can’t stand the combined touchpad/track point setup Lenovo did in that generation and I quickly replaced it with an X260. Both of them are capable of damn good battery life (I get about 5-6 hours from my X260)

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, because if the receiver of these can’t or won’t use Linux, then not efficiently trying to recycle them will either put the burden of getting them properly recycled on vulnerable people, or they just won’t be, either sitting collecting dust or being thrown in the dump.

      I’m not saying it’s a strong reason, but it is a question to consider.

      • daggermoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most people have limited experience with computers. Most of them have barely used Windows so I don’t see Linux Mint as being any more difficult for those folks.

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even taking that incredibly Lemmy-brained statement as fact, I wonder if you understand that donated computers are not primarily for people who don’t ordinarily have a reason to use computers.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Secure boot has been a requirement for like 10+ years now. I think windows 8 was when they required it on all new computers. You could turn it off if you really wanted and I think it would still work, but why would you? Linux has played well with it for almost as long.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      username checks out. I’m not even joking. no web browser has had XP support for years by now, even firefox dropped it for 7 I think last year

    • regrub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Only feasible if on an air-gapped network with no access to the internet

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        No no, that’s the point. To infect as many computers as absolutely possible, all clogging down every network, and eventually microsoft will have to address the issues.

        What do you care? I assume you’re on linux and wouldn’t be affected either way.

        • regrub@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          You seem to have a lot more faith in microsoft than I do.

          My concern is the likelyhood that companies using MS products will cut corners by using deprecated/unsupported OSs for years after the last security patch, which will lead to security breaches for many consumers.

          Not on Linux yet, but I really need to make the switch soon. Will be nice to actually have some semblance of control over my own personal devices.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            My concern is the likelyhood that companies using MS products will cut corners by using deprecated/unsupported OSs for years after the last security patch, which will lead to security breaches for many consumers.

            That likelihood is high, real and current.