They didn’t say it’s meaningless, just suggested that failing every quest leads to some type of conclusion to the game’s plot. It might not be a good conclusion, but the story ends.
To me, this just sounds like failing a quest doesn’t mean the game is over or that you need to reload a previous checkpoint or save to keep playing.
This to be honest is the correct way to handle choices. Like Baldur’s Gate of Pillars of eternity games where they list down the conclusion of all the choices player made at the end of the game.
I’d say this is debatable. Listing all choices and their conclusion (I did not play that game, so don’t know how it is presented) can take away the mystery and exploration of those choices. Some people might not like this and none way is wrong or right. I compare this to the “numbers popping up” in Action RPG games, when you hit enemies. Some like to see it, others don’t want to.
They didn’t say it’s meaningless, just suggested that failing every quest leads to some type of conclusion to the game’s plot. It might not be a good conclusion, but the story ends.
To me, this just sounds like failing a quest doesn’t mean the game is over or that you need to reload a previous checkpoint or save to keep playing.
this sounds like baldurs gate. There is little to nothing that actually ends the game.
This to be honest is the correct way to handle choices. Like Baldur’s Gate of Pillars of eternity games where they list down the conclusion of all the choices player made at the end of the game.
I’d say this is debatable. Listing all choices and their conclusion (I did not play that game, so don’t know how it is presented) can take away the mystery and exploration of those choices. Some people might not like this and none way is wrong or right. I compare this to the “numbers popping up” in Action RPG games, when you hit enemies. Some like to see it, others don’t want to.