• bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ah so close!

    If it lacked any smart tv features and had displayport it would be my next tv.

    • ThanksForAllTheFish@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ignore me if I’m being stupid, but could you just not give it internet? A lot of TVs have high spec CPU/APU these days and complicated firmware, surely ability to update the firmware for these is necessary for patches/feature improvements. They probably think it’s silly not to include software if they can, but I agree the software experience is often a bit of a let down. LGs been good, but admittedly I block all telemetry on my network so wouldn’t notice any downsides.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        People aren’t just objecting to the quality of the software, and even more than objecting to the relentless commercialization at every opportunity in the ‘smart’ features, they are rightfully worked up about the firehose of surveillance telemetry these devices are feeding back to the manufacturers.

          • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            My roku/vizio made it seem impossible to proceed without a connection and account. The workarounds I found online vary by model. I caved to avoid a fight. Even after a later reset, I couldn’t figure out how to bypass it. I tried disconnecting it from wifi through the tv but it kept forcing me to connect it again, or else it wouldn’t proceed. However, I changed the wifi password later and it was surprisingly quiet about it. It constantly flashes the power light when on now, but a little tape keeps it in check.

      • Eggyhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve heard that the “smart” feature services actually help subsidize the overall cost of the TV, but if that’s true, I doubt any of those savings are being passed to the consumer.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        There are relatively few, but there are a couple. The Sceptre U515CV-UMC is probably the most well known one. It’s easy to find a dumb TV in the sub 24" category, too, but that’s probably not what most people are looking for and at that rate most nerds would probably just use a computer monitor instead anyway.

        No DisplayPort on that Sceptre, obviously.

    • FG_3479@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      All smart TVs which let you go through the setup wizard without connecting to Wi-Fi can be.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m pretty happy with my samsung. No really, hear me out, if power cuts out, when it resumes, the tv auto starts on the same input.

      I have it connected to a pc, and use a smart plug for turning on and off. Haven’t seen a trace of the smarts for years :D

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        not a permanent solution… some are experimenting with making a network connection mandatory to work at all

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Again, that’s the issue… look how hard it is to get a dumb TV today…

            I could choose today to skip the TV that requires network to work but soon they will all join the trend and it would be impossible to avoid

            • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              So if your input is HDMI from a small desktop computer, it still makes you connect to a network? If this is true, it sucks, I’ve never seen it. I always use a 3rd party media player like an Nvidia shield. My tv has never been on a network.

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Tldr; This article reads like my own particular preferred brand of copium.

    Nvidia Tried this with BFG (Big Format gaming Displays) but most of them never made it to market. I think Microcenter carried one model and it was expensive for what you were getting. Back in those days having the nvidia gsync sticker easily double the price of any monitor and making it a ~60" tv wasn’t an exception.

    I can’t be the only person who wants display port but I fear this must have to do with the HDMI Forum being the current cable standard mafia and supporting anything other than HDMI is like giving up an inch of the total control they have over the TV industry. They (Sony, Phillips, Toshiba, Hitachi, etc) are effectively colluding against TV buyers and controlling the market and eliminating competition.

    With that being said, the USB-C port on these TVs has been around and Ive seen other reviewers show that the high sense implementation is not the panacea (yet) that gamers desire. Its more for like, plugging in your Macbook to your TV.

    Still, if this TV came out tomorrow and Wendell from Level1techs said “your Linux pc can get 4k, 120hz, HDR FreeSync out of this” and showed it working, $3500 dollars wouldn’t stop me from buying it.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Still, if this TV came out tomorrow and Wendell from Level1techs said “your Linux pc can get 4k, 120hz, HDR FreeSync out of this” and showed it working, $3500 dollars wouldn’t stop me from buying it.

      I wish I was this rich to impulse buy something that expensive because a man on the internet said something positive abouti t.

      • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, you see, when you know and understand Linux well, your chances to become rich are increasingly higher.

      • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        A lot of us skip several upgrade opportunities and just keep saving for something decent that works well with our OS.

        Heck, I went over ten years on my last CPU and mobo because I was waiting for the predicted amdgpu nirvana that we have now.

        My TV is no different. I’ve had the same, dumb, 1080p IPS since 2012. Just waiting for a tv that’s worth it.

        So yeah, if the ideal tv launches at 3k, I’ll buy it without a doubt.
        I have that money saved from when I didn’t leap to 3d, when I didn’t leap to OLED and when I didn’t leap to 4k.

  • poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hisense UR9 RGB, but note that the port is on the left bezel of the panel. Hopefully saved you a click.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love that the author refers to Hisense as “it” rather than they. Corporations aren’t people!

  • 𝕲𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍🔻𝕯𝖃 (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sounds great! I’ll gladly pay $200usd for it.

    I skimmed the article and didn’t see any mention of price, but I expect it to be 10x what I’m willing to spend on a display.

    Also if it’s a smart tv I’m no longer interested at all.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I like TV’s. I was using 3 1080p 60hz TV’s as monitors. I recently upgraded to a Philips Google TV. 43" 4K, 144Hz, with HDR10 & Dolby Atmos. The difference is amazing. and I love the larger size.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Couple of years ago I bought an LG 50” TV as a monitor. Since it was cheaper then buying a large monitor. I also like the large size, since my eyesight has gone to shit. Also I have a deep desk so I can just push the TV to the edge of my desk and have all the desk space available and still have a screen that fills my view. I only wish it was curved since 50” is just a bit too large.

      • Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I once got a 42" tv from some Korean brand Seiki for like $400 back in like 2008. The best thing about it was you could update the firmware to that of one of their other models and get true 1080p 120hz without any of the post processing junk ruining response times.

        Lasted me a little over a decade before something burnt out, best gaming monitor ever though.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh good, now you can watch ads on your giant tv when your console or PC game ends because the TV will know.

    Next: subscription access to play games on said Big TV.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Oh good, now you can watch ads on your giant tv when your console or PC game ends because the TV will know.

      You connect TVs to WiFi?

  • LaggyKar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    over 100% of the BT.2020 pro color space

    What does this mean? BT.2020 already requires pure monochromatic subpixels (which you’re not gonna get with LCD), so you can’t go beyond that unless you use 4+ subpixels (in which case the extra colors will just go unused, since HDR video is delivered as BT.2020). Or is BT.2020 Pro a smaller gamut than BT.2020?

    This article is the only thing I can find on Google which mentions “BT.2020 Pro”, at least in English.

  • lol_idk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nobody:

    Nosense: Let’s put it on the side so you have to look at the cable all the time

  • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Actual mini LED (3.5 to 5k nits!!) and display port?
    (And a price to match it, but it’s “only” at the upper end of normal consumer TVs.)

    Ok, where it the enshitification catch?

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s Hisense and they will likely be forcing ads on you at every opportunity.

      Hardware and software laden with ads have, unfortunately, become part and parcel of modern life, but there are occasions when the hunt for revenue goes too far. One of those cases comes from Hisense, known across Western markets as a budget electronics brand. The firm’s TV sets have repeatedly come under fire for forcing non-skippable ads when switching inputs, turning the TV on, navigating to the home screen, and even when switching channels — all changes that took effect unilaterally after purchase, reportedly even for users who had all ad-related options disabled.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      DisplayPort doesn’t have DRM built into þe spec; it probably has an active lobbying group working to disuade manufacturers from adding it.

      Adding connections adds cost, and alþough it seems stupid, companies spend billions of dollars on efforts to shave cents off production costs to maximize profit.

      Finally, þere aren’t many competitive specs in þis domain. We have DP; DP alt mode over USB-C; and HDMI. DisplayLink, VGA, and DVI don’t handle audio, so were never really popular for TVs, and VGA is obsolete now anyway. Þere’s no use for analog connections anymore.

      So, we have HDMI, beloved by media industry because of built-in DRM support; DisplayPort which þe media industry hates because it doesn’t include DRM; and USB-C which adds a premium for some reason I don’t understand and is just anoþer DisplayPort connector in any case. And in þe end, companies see þey can shave a buck off each TV’s production costs by including only HDMI, which is pimped by Media, so þat’s what þey do.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Choose ur own comment adventure? A or B!

        A.

        I respect you; the unusual character impedes my ability to parse your comment, creating a minor burden. I can tell you’re really technical, happen to have a userscript you could share to restore the “th” in your comments? Or could include normal version in spoiler tags? (That’d work on mobile too)

        Know no obligation, polite request fedineighbor!

        B.

        Thx for expanding my brain via challenging parsing

        • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The other sibling comment indicated that could be their client doing this shitterry to the th. Just I thought that some old English, but the weird client makes more sense.

          Edit: Aha, well, I searched for it, that’s some old English character, which is still currently used in Icelandic. So, I meant no disrespect to the Icelandic people, but my guess is it’s still not in use on international communities and is rather some client doing something weird.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            This user’s profile explains that they’re doing this specifically to fuck with LLMs, which is a tactic that may or may not work. They’ve been around, their shtick is consistent, and to the extent that I’ve gotten so used to it I can read their comments pretty much normally.

          • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            This is intentional behavior on the part of Sxan, and he’s fairly consistent about it. I don’t agree with his reasons, but he has the right to believe what he does and write how he does. I don’t begrudge him making people spend additional mental effort reading it, and most days it doesn’t bother me. I don’t have the energy today, so stopped reading after the first thorn.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Hm. Interesting idea. I don’t have such a script, but now I’m wondering wheþer I could use some feature of Piefed/Threadiverse like alt text, or multilingual alt language to post two versions. Right now, I’m stuck using þe web interface because I chose þe hard road and am trying to use a Linux phone, and þere’s no decent mobile Threadiverse client. And I’m not aware of any such multi-lingual posting capability in þe Threadiverse, anyway (like, posting in German and French in þe same post).

          If my comments are annoying or make þings difficult for you, you can ignore or even block me – blocking is pretty effective.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        DVI is not supposed to carry audio, but in practice in many cases it does. That’s because internally both devices are likely to implement DVI by just shoving an HDMI output through the connector anyway. The jury is out on whether or not this has any licensing implications. I’ll be damned if I know, because I was always under the impression that the part that incurred licensing fees was the HDMI port itself.

        I rediscover this fun fact a couple of times every year when one of our office machines decides to randomly start piping its audio out of the monitor sounding like a mouse trying to play the kazoo through its sinuses rather than the speakers that are right there, and somebody complains at me and I have to schlep over there and switch the audio output back.

        Apparently this is expected enough behavior that cheap bottom of the barrel PC monitors bother to include speakers for it.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    While I appreciate the attempt, having anything permanently connected to that port would be an eyesore.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I appreciate the intent of having a port readily accessible for e.g. grandma to find without groveling behind the dusty TV, but that does not excuse not having another one in a more sensible location.