thats not very good for safety

Oh, I see, I am referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled-access_highway I guess you are not.

What the fuck. Oh well, in civilized countries at least.

You are preaching to the quire. I doubt however that argument flies well with most achools.

Cycles are not allowed on highways. Neither are left turns for that matter.

As much as I like kagi, a paid search engine is a tough sell for public schools

the glow doesnt scare them away tho

why would xitter want it?

Well, this has now happened once, now we know it could happen again. Trust has been broken.

while true, that doesn’t cover 40 years of accumulated storage costs

I’m confused. Claritins active substance is loratadine, which is an antihistamine.
Youre saying it keeps people up but they take it to sleep?

Honestly quite sensible, the mutual respect of property is quite low at the moment, for obvious reasons.

Makes the argument against siezing of russian owned money and assets quite a bit weaker though

the plate lookup they do anyways, where they get all the info digitally

heres one product https://www.birdshades.com/

I assume the others use relatively similar tech. Since human and bird vision doesnt line up perfectly, there are wavelengths visible to birds outside of our vision.

Well, since there are alternatives that achieve the same, but invisible to the human eye, i still think its an annoying choice.

I used to be curious about switching to proton

it certainly hasn’t improved much since then.

I’ve heard the opposite talked about quite a bit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5nGmE92zNA

I choose to believe you meant to call autocorrect defiant :)

Yeah, thats my understanding too. I just think the point would be better made with comparable numbers than with comparing apples to oranges.

for comparable numbers we have to control for amount of humans in proximity to sharks vs amount of humans in proximity to humans.

I mean, id still wager humans win out, but not nearly by as much.