kewwwi@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agodyklemmy.worldimagemessage-square141linkfedilinkarrow-up1718arrow-down129
arrow-up1689arrow-down1imagedyklemmy.worldkewwwi@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square141linkfedilink
minus-squareBiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·21 hours agoWhy wouldn’t you? There are very few instances in which one can assume they have consent over another person’s body.
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down15·21 hours agoBecause rape is something that happens to a person, not an object. Are women raping their dildos?
minus-squareSagan_Wept@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·20 hours agoHey, what kinda person are you?
minus-squareBiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·21 hours agoPutting aside the discussion about bodies and objects, the primary concern is consent - which also applies to objects anyway. Would you steal a dead person’s wallet “because they don’t need it anymore”?
Why wouldn’t you? There are very few instances in which one can assume they have consent over another person’s body.
Because rape is something that happens to a person, not an object. Are women raping their dildos?
Hey, what kinda person are you?
A rational one.
Putting aside the discussion about bodies and objects, the primary concern is consent - which also applies to objects anyway. Would you steal a dead person’s wallet “because they don’t need it anymore”?
Can you rape a wallet?