cross-posted from: https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/post/2333639

I was just forwarded this someone in my household who watches our server. That’s it folks. I’ve been a hold out for a long time, but this is honestly it.

They want me to pay to stream content that I bought from my hardware transcoded also on my hardware.

I’ll say it. As of today, I say Plex is dead. Luckily I’ve been setting up Jellyfin, I guess it’s time to make it production ready.

Edit: I have a Plex Pass. More comments saying “Just buy a plex pass” are seriously not getting it. I have a Plex Pass and my users are still getting this.

And for the thousandth person who wants to say the same things to me:

  • YES I know I’m unaffected as a Plex Pass owner.
  • My users were immediately angry at it, which made me angry. Our users don’t understand what plex pass is, and they shouldn’t have to, that’s why I had it. The fact that they were pinged even though it should have kept working is horribly sloppy
  • Plex is still removing functionality. I don’t care that “People should pay their fair share”. If Plex wants to put every new feature behind a paywall, that’s completely okay. They are removing functionality.
    • “But they have cloud costs”. Remote streaming is negligible to them. It’s a dynamic DNS service. Plex client logs in, asks where server is, plex cloud responds with the IP and port of where server is located. That’s it.
    • “Good luck finding another remote streaming” - Again, Plex just opens up an IP and port. Jellyfin also just opens up an IP and port (Hold on jellyfin folks I know, security, that’s a separate conversation). All “remote streaming” is is their dynamic dns. Literal pennies to them. Know what actually is costing them money? Hosting all of that ad-supported “free” content that they’re probably losing money on.

In short, I don’t care how you justify it. Plex is doing something shitty. They’re removing functionality that has been free for years. I’m not responding to any more of your comments repeating the same arguments over and over.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Seems like it was only a matter of time.

    20% more will jump to Jellyfin. The other 80% will entrench and talk even more about how great Plex is. I mean Jesus, $250 to watch pirated movies. lol wtf It’s also fucking wild to me that people are defending a monetization model that is on self hosted hardware. Like, I gotta pay for my server and then a license to avoid buying DVDs. Fuck it, at this point just buy the fucking movie.

    Ya’ll are brain dead. Plex loves you tho.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yup, read through this thread and it becomes clearer and clearer. and trust me, I’ve been a long time hold out, I’ve been through this many times - but this is the first time I’ve seen functionality removed from Plex to be put behind a paywall. And doing a price hike at the same time. Absolutely shitty. I’ve already migrated off.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        You have a plex pass though, so nothing changed for you - you just got all angry because you didn’t read the email properly.

        Your users are going to be much worse off now than they were, and you will absolutely lose a bunch of them who don’t want to (or can’t) have to connect to a VPN every time they want to stream from your library.

    • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      I dunno man, I don’t care much, when Plex gets shitty enough I’ll jump. But paying for the ongoing maintenance of software isn’t some evil thing, even if I self host it.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        You’re not paying for software maintenance, you’re paying a subscription service to a private company that has already decided to cut back on features that others also thought they were paying to maintain.

        If you want to actually pay for software maintenance, migrate to Jellyfin and pay them instead, rather than filtering your payments through middle managers and shareholders first.

        • Legume5534@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Many of us bought lifetime passes ages ago though so we’re not paying a subscription.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s also fucking wild to me that people are defending a monetization model that is on self hosted hardware.

      It’s wild to me that people who claim to be tech savvy don’t understand that Plex Server, the software, is what makes Plex what it is and as popular as it is. No other solution exists that is as easy as Plex and as secure as Plex. Jellyfin, Emby, Kodi, etc are nowhere near as simple to use and don’t have the breadth of app support that Plex does. Plex is basically on every device anyone owns. They sign in and they can stream from everyones libraries. No VPNs needed, no other hoops.

      I paid like $100 for a lifetime Plex Pass like 10 years ago. The 2 dozen friends and family that share my server don’t pay a cent and this changes nothing.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        No other solution exists that is as easy as Plex and as secure as Plex.

        Entrenchment. This is a profoundly absurd statement.

        I paid like $100 for a lifetime Plex Pass like 10 years ago.

        You paid $100 to access software hosted on your own devices. That’s wonderful you think that’s a great idea. I’m sure the Plex devs love you and would kiss you right on the mouth.

        They sign in and they can stream from everyones libraries. No VPNs needed, no other hoops.

        Because you’re vendor locked in… lol.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          I paid $100 to play Forza Horizon on my own device too - should that have been free?

          This is a profoundly absurd statement.

          That no other solution exists that is as easy and secure as Plex? That’s not just absurd, but profoundly absurd? What other solution is there that is?

          Your entire argument seems to be that software should be free if it’s on your own device, which is a profoundly absurd statement. The only paid software should be on hardware you don’t own?

          • Xanza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            I paid $100 to play Forza Horizon on my own device too - should that have been free?

            This is a complete false equivalence and I feel that you know that. The idea of a console is to expand it by buying new games. That’s not unexpected.

            Your entire argument seems to be that software should be free

            I am a software developer. The argument isn’t that software should be free. The argument is that this is an exceptionally poor business model and as a developer I’m disgusted that people are defending it. The VC which owns Plex and other VCs will use this “logic” that you have to move the goal posts further, and further, and further, and further until there’s no such thing as free software anymore. And I think that’s fucked up.

            At the end of the day you’re paying twice to avoid buying IP. Just fucking buy the IP if you’re going to be stupid. Movies are like $12. At $250 you’re paying $2.10/mo in addition to your hosting costs.

            Just go buy 20 movies for the same price. It’s so dumb.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              This is a complete false equivalence and I feel that you know that. The idea of a console is to expand it by buying new games. That’s not unexpected.

              It’s not though. The idea of self hosting isn’t to not have any software costs associated with it. Domain names aren’t free. VPNs (that you use to aquire content) aren’t free. Cloud backups aren’t free. Would you prefer everything was free? Absolutely. Do you sometimes have to pay to get the best software for the job? Absolutely, and Plex is that software.

              I am a software developer.

              Same here! That makes your argument even crazier to me! Someone demanding that your software should be free and should never be changed to be paid even if it means the company goes under is bananas.

              The argument is that this is an exceptionally poor business model and as a developer I’m disgusted that people are defending it.

              The business model of having the people that use their main product that requires the most development and time and resources, Plex Server, pay either a cheap one off fee (that regularly goes on sale for half price) or a monthly subscription fee in order to use it, is “exceptionally poor”? How so? Is it just that it was free? This business model has been around for eternity. Get people in the door and hooked by offering it for free, then start charging for it. It’s one of the actual best business models around, not “exceptionally poor” lol. You’re looking at it from the “I want it to be free forever” point of view, not the “We need it to be a viable business with revenue to be able to sustain it” point of view.

              until there’s no such thing as free software anymore.

              That will never happen, because people will always be making free software to put out there for people to try and to use - and many of them will then transition to PAID because it’s not sustainable otherwise. For software to thrive you often have to have full time developers working on it, and full time developers need to be paid.

              At the end of the day you’re paying twice to avoid buying IP. Just fucking buy the IP if you’re going to be stupid. Movies are like $12. At $250 you’re paying $2.10/mo in addition to your hosting costs.

              Just go buy 20 movies for the same price. It’s so dumb.

              I paid ~$100 ~10 years ago for Plex Pass. It paid for itself instantly as I was simply supporting the developers of the software. As a software developer I have no problem doing that. I wasn’t forced to buy it, but I did.

              I’m not quite sure where you got this $250 figure from though? What is that, the monthly remote pass x 12? Also most people running a plex server get far more than 20 movies a year lol. Pretty sure I got 20 movies last night.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Doesn’t jellyfin just not do this at all? Like if you want to stream remotely you need to figure out a vpn solution to do it?

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Completely unreasonable to need to walk people through this. It’s OK to say jellyfin can’t do remote access.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        You can stream remotely via jellyfin if you expose your server to the internet. VPN is safer but not the only option.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Yeah, no way. Jellyfins Backend is like an open barn door. And with the kind of content most of us here offer through either Jellyfin or Plex, I wouldn’t want to open up like that.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Anecdotal but I’ve run Jellyfin publicly without any issues for around 5 years. It even has its own domain name.

        • themachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          That is not correct. A VPN would be one method but you can also just expose the service to the internet in a number of ways and accomplish the same thing Plex provides.

      • charles@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        You’re 100% correct. I always find it funny how hardcore some people are with jellyfin vs Plex. I’ll probably end up getting downvotes on this but imo Plex is way simpler to setup and keep running, and as a lifetime pass owner, I’ve very rarely felt like my experience has been deteriorated by any of the changes that the jellyfin crowd freaks out about. Plus plexamp is honestly such a great music player. I’ll happily keep running Plex for the foreseeable future.

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Oh no a paid, proprietary, piece of shit software does something shitty. Who could’ve ever saw this coming?!

    I’ve said it for years anytime anyone mentioned running a Plex server. As soon as you install that on your server or your homelab it’s no longer your server. Proprietary software is malware

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    I never got the idea of selfhosting but paying (except for enterprise-grade support or donations) anyway.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      For a good while, Plex was the only game in town that did the job well, and they put the transcoding feature behind the paywall.

      Given it wasn’t that expensive for a lifetime pass a number of years ago (I remember it was cheaper than a game anyway) and they still seemed relatively user-centric at the time, many people like me felt like they were supporting developers building something that was useful to us.

      I still run my Plex server since it’s not really costing me not to, but I’ve been running Jellyfin too for a little while and it more or less can do the same job these days

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      In the case of plex, it’s not 100% selfhosted. There’s a dependence on plexs public infrastructure for user management/authentication. They also help bypass NAT by proxying connections through their servers so you don’t have to setup port forwarding and can even easily escape double NAT situations.

      I can understand paying for that convenience, but cost keeps rising while previously free features continue to get locked behind paywalls.

      Tbh, having users required to authenticate with plex.tv was enough for me to look elsewhere. The biggest reason to self host for me is to remove dependency on public services.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    not a plex user but someone buried the lede here… to me, this is the neon sign that screams GTFO:

    we noticed that you’ve accessed libraries in the past

    what business of yours is it to notice my private comings and goings?! what other actionable intel do y’all keep in your logs?! bye!

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      External servers are shared with you, they can just check which owners have libraries shared with them. That’s not some nefarious logging, its information they need to offer that function

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Counterpoint: I can access my friend’s Jellyfin servers, and they can access mine, without anyone else in the world knowing what the fuck we’re doing. Saying “It’s necessary” always begs the question “Why did you make it necessary?”

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Because Plex handles the initial connection for you allowing the clients to lunch through CGNAT and other shit. Also they handle the authentication, which I would fully agree would be nice to have independent, but that’s the reason

  • drspod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Trying to monetize the piracy of your users. That’s a bold business strategy.

    Look, I know a lot of people could be using the sharing feature to share material that is in the public domain or that they own the copyright to, but let’s be honest: most of that sharing would be considered an “unlicensed public performance” by the MAFIAA.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      They sold to private equity a couple years back. The enshittification started that day.

      • jonathan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        They took VC funding (which is also bad), selling to private equity is very different (they strip mine businesses).

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Jellyfin users have been warning about such things for a long time, but very few actually listened. Well, here we are, hope more people migrate now

  • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’ve only ever used jellyfin and have no complaints.

    I avoided plex and went with jellyfill because it’s free/libre software.

  • cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    It was only a matter of time. Plex is a Series C startup, employs 100+ people, and has taken substantial VC investment. Those investors are expecting exponential returns, and a “one-time lifetime payment” will never sustain that sort of growth