• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    19 days ago

    Depends on the arena I guess

    I am wondering about the logic of cutting chicken out for it being weak, yet still consuming unborn, and assumedly weaker still, chickens

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            If you ever seen an emu up close you can see why. I’m not sure to what extent birds are dinosaurs, and to what extent they’re actually a different species, but if any bird is a dinosaur it’s the emu. Albeit an incredibly stupid and aggressive dinosaur.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Maybe with some gravity assist?

          Or velocity assist?

          Supposing you hard boiled one…

    • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      Eating unborn weaker chickens lets you eat their future, their potential. Thus you take what they could be which is more powerful than just taking what they are as a chicken.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        This is why Hillary Clinton consumes the fetuses of the children she molests in her underground pizza restaurant basement network, to consume their life force. This is why eggs are so expensive.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Eggs have every single vitamin you need in a day, except vitamin C, and lots of protein I guess. I presume those vitamins have been consumed by the hatched chicken. Not sure about the biochemistry here but I assume the vitamins are then “spent”. I hope someone will correct me if I’m wrong.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Giving this person all of the doubts and then some: Chicken often get fed estrogen to force their growth. I believe, traces of this estrogen can still be found in the meat. And then there was also a myth that this estrogen could affect the cup size, in both women and men.

      So, maybe there’s some half-knowledge of a myth in there and that’s why their misbelief, that avoiding estrogen makes them manly, somehow lead them to cut out chicken meat…?

      To give any source at all, this looks like a pretty comprehensive discussion, although no idea if it is trustworthy: https://featheredfarmlife.com/chicken-and-hormones-separating-fact-from-fiction/

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      It’s hard to explain but that’s sort of before they’re born. You get to absorb the essence of the entire life that they would have had ahead of them.

      An adult chicken has already lived most of their life. All you’re getting is weakness from old age.