Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agoThey have already decided to promote an existing employee. But play the "search" game and screw youlemmy.worldimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1613arrow-down15
arrow-up1608arrow-down1imageThey have already decided to promote an existing employee. But play the "search" game and screw youlemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up53·17 days agoin government positions, search is sometimes mandated. i once competed for a job for which i was the current temporary contractor, and they asked me to write the job description. somehow i got the job. does that count?
minus-squareFinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·17 days agoI can see how thst’s kind of productive assuming they needed a template for the job description so they could use it in future if you quit
minus-squareEat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·17 days agoThey’re called position descriptions and just about every job in fed gov has one, probably a third of them are standardized, and other third are just lightly modified standard PDs.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 days agoI think mandating search is good but they should have a clause for a case like yours
in government positions, search is sometimes mandated.
i once competed for a job for which i was the current temporary contractor, and they asked me to write the job description.
somehow i got the job. does that count?
I can see how thst’s kind of productive assuming they needed a template for the job description so they could use it in future if you quit
They’re called position descriptions and just about every job in fed gov has one, probably a third of them are standardized, and other third are just lightly modified standard PDs.
deleted by creator
I think mandating search is good but they should have a clause for a case like yours