untorquer

Not sure where i decided the narrator is unreliable. They say their partner loves it. Two people happy in a relationship. An example of how one problem solved to meet the needs communicated by the other. The result being positive. That’s just reading what’s written. I don’t see where i made something up. I provided examples of types of people who may use a logic like this but didn’t prescribed it to op.

Not a dynamic for me but i wouldn’t gawk at someone for feeling fulfilled in it. I get the humor that it’s expected to be considered demeaning.

🤷

DDG performance has dropped for me. I use a mix of their app and Firefox loaded with a searxng.

https://paulgo.io/

Works like old Google, No ads, tends to reduce SEO sloop that DDG is susceptible to.

Unhealthy would be if you as the other in the relationship (the one seeking affection here) were not ok with this and tried to change it. It Doesn’t sound like the relationship with the dog is negotiable.

I wouldn’t be happy in that relationship because i need emotional mutuality/reflection, which is clearly muted here. But the two partners here are obviously fine with it.

I don’t mean to diagnose anyone but this is fairly common for both trauma survivors and neurodivergence. Animals are just going to always be safer than people for some folks, and those folk also deserve love.

Didn’t know, sorry for the tangent 😕

Don’t insult people it’s not acute

This gloriously aligned with a conversation i was having. Peak copy pasta

It’s just healthy adaptation. They care for their partner so they found a way to meet their partner’s needs that isn’t overly burdensome.

Saaame. I feel like my 20’s were my 40’s and my 30’s are healing my inner 20yo but in a less caustic way.

No, both. The interviewer seems extra comfortable at the start but by the end they both seem on the same level. I think in a good way, not sure it’s a good method to get a read on either of them if i know my friends 😆

The body language in this video is wild.