Infinite-length water edging.

Blockchain m8 gg

high-tech solution for measuring and promoting old tech efficacy? investors looking at this “How is this supposed to make us more profitable as a company?” CTO in response “…We could sell the information to other companies… or even trade it with third parties like individuals, or even organs of government…”. Investors: “Interesting! We would need to be careful with how we would go about doing that, no?” CTO: “sigh Time to reorganize the department again. and this time I must be sure to purge the lead designer on the software, so they don’t form any attachments to the use cases of the sale or propriety of the resultant information from the project”

U R whatcha 8

I had heard of it as a millennial-Z cusp child from the central midwest US. “Mad hops” was when we were really hamming up our props to each other, and “hops” just meant you could jump high, possibly making it look effortless.

Ecopunk

#me too

It may not be considered organic at this point, but I can still give a shit if I have to!

I like autonomous drone strikes more than tank’s nowadays anyways.

I wish I were there to see for myself, since that is how I am able to verify evidence

Thank you for explaining. you have saved me time, money, and heartbreak.

Ends the justify means thinking. “why improve the process or experience, when my way already works far better than simply stomping on them to get them to open up?”

“because the taste of shoe doesn’t pair well with many flavors”

“My way has 85% less shoe licking”

“Ok, I can think of at least 3 ways you could remove the shoe entirely and it would almost certainly still work (unless of course people intentionally misuse the tools required for the solution)”

“You just want to go back to stomping on them, don’t you!”

If you lack scientific understanding of the material world, or you are wanting to use cynicism and disregard as proof, just say so.

All those people who were “relieved from extreme poverty” in such settler nations chose to do so on the backs of indentured servants who are not counted in your statistics, as white men tended to often exclude in consideration when formulating convincing metrics to justify their behavior.

Actions have always “spoken” louder than the thought we have, especially the thoughts which some people may choose to put into words in various contexts. few creatures in existence are brave enough for actual honest self reflection beyond some personal threshold of comfort which they have established for themselves, and wish to venture no further beyond. I think people who don’t recognize any of what I am talking about above, or who may be narcissistically excluding themselves from consideration while agreeing with the sentiment, are some of the people who end up screeching as you have described, over topics that they have yet to delve deeply into, as they fear being perceived as amateur or even novice, while never even fully recognizing that the Dunning-Kruger effect simply must apply to themselves as well, to some degree, in any area of study that they are actively pursuing with passion.

not trying to intrude or provide any valid critique or communicable perspective necessarily, but I was wondering what the concept of “Political” means, in terms you could best use to describe the feeling/notion to someone? I can think of a couple criteria in mind that I would associate as making a topic that was not otherwise related directly to activities of some level of some government somewhere, suddenly seem “Political” from my perspective. I am curious mostly just what criteria you might use to filter topics or general ideas?

if I sound like a bot it’s because spectrum disorder not autofill so read carefully for L’s sake

Was the costco size a cheese pizza, or pepperoni?