• Pika@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Alan Walker

    The dude has just seen one tune go viral and decided “why not make ALL of my music exactly like this?”

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I was just listening to them for the first time in a long while last week. There’s a noticeably difference pre and post elevation album.

  • mayorchid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Jack Johnson. If you hear one of his songs in public just say “oh, Banana Pancakes” and move on with your life. Not a soul on earth will be able to correct you

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s most bands, isn’t it? That’s why we have favorites, because we like how they sound. I mean, I suppose there’s people who like a particular band because of their technical skill in general, but for most people isn’t it the particular sound they have that draws us in?

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      To some degree you are correct, however there is a massive difference between a band like AC/DC which had jokingly been said they have have the same album for 40 years, and say Metallica.

      Metallica helped define what Thrash Metal is. But listening to Load/Reload vs Ride the Lightning is a huge difference in sound.

      And you take it forward another 10 years from Reload the sound has changed all over again.

      Very different from AC/DC but then again most bands/artists don’t have 50 year careers as the biggest name in their musical setting

  • Dämnyz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    You have to make a distinction between bands that have a (more or less) coherent sound and style, and blatant repetition. Anyway, if anyone tries to tell me that Volbeat isn’t just rereleasing the same song for the whole time they existed, I have to assume that one of us must be demented.

  • Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    AC/DC and CCR come to mind. Doesn’t bother me though. It’s the audio equivalent to eating a bag of Doritos. The flavor doesn’t change, but every now and then there’s one with a little more powder on it.

  • GrishAix@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reading the comments, it sounds like it’s a bad thing for a band to stick to their sound. I actually think that’s good. After all, I started listening to a band because of their sound. When they suddenly reinvent themselves, they usually lose me.

    Positive example: Interpol. In my opinion, the band got better over time but kept the exact same sound.

    Negative example: Radiohead. At some point, Thom Yorke just started letting cats walk across synthesizers.

    Translated by a machine. Spelling errors are subject to the copyright of “Google Gemini”.

    • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mamaleek change up the sound on every album, and still have their defining mood and are different from everyone else. If I want the different Mamaleek sounds, I listen to the different albums.

      About the same with King Crimson, I think, but with longer series of albums.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess you stopped listening to Radiohead after Kid A? Really, really bad take.

  • The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    AC/DC for sure. Every song has the same vibe. It’s a good vibe, but once you’ve heard one song, you’ve heard them all.

    …is it going to be controversial if I also say The Beatles? Maybe not ALL of their music, but most.

    • 0ops@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      The Beatles is like 4 bands wearing a trenchcoat, so I’m gonna have to disagree with you there. I wouldn’t even say any individual album is samey from at least sgt peppers on

    • Deacon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pre 1964 Beatles I will give you. After, say, Revolver? I don’t see how you could compare Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds to Tomorrow Never Knows to Martha My Dear to Back in the USSR to Sun King, etc etc etc

      Often you can tell it’s the same band, but these are meaningfully different sonic experiences.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is very controversial to say that of the Beatles. Once they stopped doing live shows they reinvented themselves.

    • Canopyflyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      AC/DC music is nothing more than 4 chords and a beat.

      And you know, sometimes that’s all you need.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Say what you will about AC/DC, nobody else can convey the idea of sweaty testicles in musical form as effectively as they do.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Beatles did evolve over time. Their early stuff all sounds the same and their late stuff all sounds the same, but there’s a big difference between their boy band phase and their stoner phase.

      • The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess I’m just associating them with their “boy band” phase then. Most of my Beatles listening was probably from the collection of hits on the 1 album back in the late 90s or early 2000s, whenever that came out.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fyi Bon Scot suggested Brian Johnson replace him if he died early.

        Check out Geordie if you want to see what he was doing before joining AC/DC… Is different.

        • sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Oh I like Brian Johnson but that is when everything started sounding the same. Good thing that I like that one thing they did :-)

          Geordie sounds pretty good. I’ll have to check out more.

          There’s also Rabbit with Dave Evans who was the singer on the first AC/DC single. They are, well, eh.