• kadup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And we would soon follow.

      There’s a difference between “okay, Aedes and Anopheles do not belong here and can be exterminated from this local environment because we inadvertently introduced them here” versus “let’s just exterminate all mosquitos, you know, some of the most important biomass that feeds uncountable species in a deeply interconnected network of ecological interactions that directly affects us”

      It’s a significantly better idea to come up with solutions to the actual diseases.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Killing Anopheles is easy and smart, because no more malaria, and there are many other options to fill the niche.

        Killing Anopheles while not also wiping out all those other insects is really really really hard

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            There are some 30 species of mosquitos that can transmit Malaria. There are about 3470 species of mosquitoes that don’t.

            So, if you get rid of those 30, some of the other will probably be a decent food source.

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Interesting ethical dilemma: everyone loses someone they love to a mosquito borne illness, thus motivating the human race to quickly eliminate them, ultimately saving more people than if we didn’t all lose a loved one at once.