• Dzso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    My first reaction was “who give a fuck?” then I got to the part of the article that says:

    His website, which also features the purple dragon and a bunch of busted links in the footer, says that the firm “integrates AI to lower the cost of legal services.”

    Which is honestly a thousand times more concerning than how he chooses to display his silly logo. Dude is writing legal documents with AI. At least his lack of professionalism is obvious.

    • Angel Mountain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Pretty sure all law firms do that nowadays. And they are quite stupid if they don’t. As long as they check the output…

  • Sam Tamaskan@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    10 years ago I would’ve agreed that this kind of watermark was inappropriate. But seeing how much of our federal legal system has become a joke, up to and including the Supreme Court, decorum isn’t high on my priority list anymore

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Agreed, the US Supreme Court is entirely responsible if they receive more ridicule than respect these days.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I would not mind if they toned it down to what other people do for a watermark. As in: if you really look for it, it is noticeable, but it does not obstruct actual contents, or makes it harder to read.

    And if they don’t want it to be copied or scanned, just drop in a few Eurions.

  • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Is it just me, or it kinda sounds like they don’t want to prococess a complaint? A warning not to do that again would be enough, IMO, given it seems like there are no rules prohibiting this.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I’m genuinely surprised that corporations haven’t started sponsoring defendants through watermarking their company logos on legal briefings.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        If you don’t think it’s weird to draw funny cartoon animals all over official documents, and somewhat attempt to guess people’s marital status out of nowhere when they do, you might be a bit weird.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Celebacy has nothing to do with marital status, lol. You can marry and never fuck.

          Calling someone weird because of something harmless simply because it isn’t the norm, now that’s weird.