• LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    How can you spend time thinking about phones, when there are children starving to death in Africa! See, I am can do that too.

    Besides, I do carry cash for everyday expenses, and I do prefer cash. I don’t know where you got that idea from.

    But the question was to replace tap-to-pay. Sadly, tapping people with a fiver makes them irritated at best.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’ve got nothing against you. I’m just not willing to accept a lecture (from other people, not you) about being “lazy” for wanting tap-to-pay on my cell phone. My statement is that the convenience of tap-to-pay for payment cards and transit passes is not worth the otherwise marginal privacy benefit of switching to Graphene.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I understood that, and I disagree with that statement either.

        A plastic card has no wifi, mobile radio, gps, cameras or microphone. The only data it can give away is “john smith paid here for porn and liquor at 4:20”. A phone has all of the above, and uses them to collect data about you, which is then used against you. Graphene, by not running all the vendor-specific, preinstalled garbage in the background, is a lot better in that regard than any smartphone you can buy at the store.

        So, in my opinion, it is worth to give up the small convenience of tap-to-pay with a phone and use tap-to-pay with a card. Yes, cash would be even better, but better is the enemy of good. Paying with Monero in a dark alley while wearing a ski mask is even better than that, right?