The image is AI, of course, but it’s irritating that I can’t even find where it came from. Usually my image search tools help me track down a source. Someone just posted this AI slop without a care in the world, and the others sharing it without context are not helping.
This one is a bit difficult. When I looked it up, it showed low chance of AI, but I tried only on tool.
Trying to reverse image search it, is just a shit ton of people sharing the same image across different sites. I wasn’t able to actually nail down where it came from either.
Thanks for that link. Bookmarking it to use later.
What’s annoying is when you get different results from these tools. The first one seemed to be more reliable, but it’s like are you relying on AI to detect AI? This shit always bugs me
Buddy, that’s all it has ever been. Sell you the problem, and then sell you a solution that doesn’t work either. At some point you realize the only solution is not to play.
I agree that it seems impossible for a truck to be stuck like that. But you can’t see if there are some steel rods jutting through appropriate places or something else weird going on to keep it there. Think about floating shelves, tensegrity tables, or those street performers sitting/levitating in an “impossible” seat, for example.
You can’t necessarily “see” physics in a still frame picture. There are millions of examples of things that look impossible, but you’re just seeing them from the wrong angle, and there’s some hidden thing going on.
That edge of the building is an immediate and completely apparent error in whatever work was done to generate the image.
You would need a piece of metal long enough to support, of which there are very clearly none even if they remained at their full length. It’s also a massive truck, and I’d dare you to get even just a fast moving motorcycle up there. As for your “it could be moving” comment no it fucking couldn’t. The picture is in focus, the subject well centered, and there’s already a fire truck and burn marks.
What probably happened was some kind of explosion or other damage and someone photoshopped in the truck because it was funny.
The image is AI, of course, but it’s irritating that I can’t even find where it came from. Usually my image search tools help me track down a source. Someone just posted this AI slop without a care in the world, and the others sharing it without context are not helping.
Could be classic Photoshop
I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few 'shops in my time.
It’s an old meme, but it checks out.
This one is a bit difficult. When I looked it up, it showed low chance of AI, but I tried only on tool.
Trying to reverse image search it, is just a shit ton of people sharing the same image across different sites. I wasn’t able to actually nail down where it came from either.
Thanks for that link. Bookmarking it to use later.
Edit: tools to check
https://aiphotocheck.com/ https://www.reversely.ai/ai-image-detector
What’s annoying is when you get different results from these tools. The first one seemed to be more reliable, but it’s like are you relying on AI to detect AI? This shit always bugs me
Buddy, that’s all it has ever been. Sell you the problem, and then sell you a solution that doesn’t work either. At some point you realize the only solution is not to play.
Look up the Photoshop detection website, it’s been a minute since I used it last, but that was pretty good for detecting.
Not saying it’s AI, but look at the right edge of the building above and below the truck. It’s definitely fake.
Look at the physics of a full truck being held horizontal by a small section of an exterior around the cab
I agree that it seems impossible for a truck to be stuck like that. But you can’t see if there are some steel rods jutting through appropriate places or something else weird going on to keep it there. Think about floating shelves, tensegrity tables, or those street performers sitting/levitating in an “impossible” seat, for example.
You can’t necessarily “see” physics in a still frame picture. There are millions of examples of things that look impossible, but you’re just seeing them from the wrong angle, and there’s some hidden thing going on.
That edge of the building is an immediate and completely apparent error in whatever work was done to generate the image.
I get your point but all of those are lighter weight with deliberately hidden supports and this is a 10,000kg+ truck
The truck could also be moving. You have no idea from a still picture.
You would need a piece of metal long enough to support, of which there are very clearly none even if they remained at their full length. It’s also a massive truck, and I’d dare you to get even just a fast moving motorcycle up there. As for your “it could be moving” comment no it fucking couldn’t. The picture is in focus, the subject well centered, and there’s already a fire truck and burn marks.
What probably happened was some kind of explosion or other damage and someone photoshopped in the truck because it was funny.