@nostupidquestions which are the light weight browsers that can browse literally any modern website ? (edited)

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    We’re no longer just rendering text anymore. It’s at the point webpages are basically compiled in real time.

    It’s no longer possible unless you give up a lot

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Whatever’s the most debloated version of firefox or chrome.

    You will not get all websites on something thats light weight. Web browsers are basically mini operating systems at this point.

  • Not a newt@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If the “literally any modern website” part is a hard requirement, then I would suggest to go for a fork of modern mainstream browsers with strong privacy/adblocking features. The justification for this is that browser engines can only get so light in terms of complexity and still support modern sites, but sites themselves can be made to be less resource demanding on the browser by selectively blocking unwanted elements. Adblocking is the obvious, blocking unwanted JavaScript would likely be the next best bang for the buck, but even clearing the cache after each session can make the browser feel faster if your bottleneck is memory/cpu instead of the network.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    as usually you have to go with privacy respecting open source browsers, cause those dont get pointless feature integrations. you havent specified the platform so:

    • for android: ironfox, fennec, helium
    • for pc: ungoogled chromium, librewolf, helium

    you should also look around on alternativeto.net

    • Scirocco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Both Fennec and Vanadium work very well for me on Android.

      Vanadium is bundled on Graphene OS, but it might work on stock android or other variants Apparently not as it relies on the OS hardening that Graphene does, particularly malloc()

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    A “minimum RAM, maximum screen real estate” browser?

    I’ve used many browser forks. But I needed one for that specific constraint, and my search landed me on Zen Browser.

    However, keep in mind that extensions are heavy. If you need (for example) adblocking, then a browser integrating an Adblock engine natively is best.

    • kepix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      …just make sure op is at least 30, so can handle a 15 year old firefox ui and featureset and lacking extensionsupport

      • tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        UI is old yes , lacking extension support ? no , not at all Pale Moon can handle all of firefox’s extensions just fine , also its UI is simple and comfier than most of todays good looking colored bs UI’s that u need to look ages for a simple feature !

        I’m 28 by the way

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It used to be opera. These days though, pretty much every browser is based on chrome, chromium or Firefox. To support modern websites as you specified is very complex, especially when taking into account security and performance. I don’t know of any lesser known browser engines if you expect to render common websites and support video, sound, animations and so on.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Realistically speaking, the most lightweight browser capable of using modern websites and not just being reskinned Firefox or some Chromium-based browser is Luakit.

    It uses Webkit for rendering and Lua for configuration – but be aware, the configuration is absurdly overcomplicated and complex and extremely poor documented.

    https://luakit.github.io/

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even Chromium browsers, which is unfortunately the standard most websites are built around, don’t support everything that well. Can’t be done.

    There is a Waterfox Portable, but lately I haven’t been able to get it to use Video Calls on things such as Discord or Zoom (it worked in the past, might be a current update issue).

  • CombatWombat@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m guessing you’re looking for librewolf or waterfox, though I doubt they are strictly lightweight or can browse literally any modern website.

      • CombatWombat@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I would say figuratively any. There are a few websites that build on Chrome-specific web features, but it’s not prohibitively many.

        • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I can confirm that the car building website thing for ordering a new BMW doesn’t work with Librewolf.

          Anyway, I didn’t buy a BMW.