

Yay, that’s fantastic to hear!
Also, how’s your experience been with the PE? Getting a readymade device in a nice shell is appealing for sure 😅


Yay, that’s fantastic to hear!
Also, how’s your experience been with the PE? Getting a readymade device in a nice shell is appealing for sure 😅


Oh, in the demo gif, that’s via a shortcut (holding power for half a second). Sorry, can’t help with wakeword there 😅


Very cool. I’ll definitely look into that, and let you know back here :D


Glad to be of service… 😄
did you consider metaphone matching?
I did not even know about this. Sounds super interesting. Though it seems to be very language specific?
My original intent was to not rely on language specifics. But maybe we could just define additional steps in the pipeline for specific languages. Hm. I’ll have to think about this some more, but it might definitely be a great idea for a future version, so thanks for telling me about it!!


Have fun, hope this works out for you! FYI: you can also use an LLM as an additional fallback (first closest-intent, then on failure, LLM). README mentions it further down on Github.


Yeah. I think this is one of the best examples of letting nix do the hard stuff for you.


Neovim, configured entirely through nixvim. I always liked neovim, but it’s never been as incredibly stable as now with nixvim.
Main/only IDE both in private and at work. Can’t ever go back, muscle memory has ensured that.
You mean, the one in the GHSA that was swiftly fixed in accordance with proper protocols?
“Hugely overblown”, you mean.
Nice, that one seems really similar. How do you like Laser compared to Inkjet?
Well then… compliments to your sister for the choice.
Wait, so the printer chose you?
I bought a Brother HL-L2375DW a couple of years back specifically for Linux compatibility, and it did NOT disappoint.
I don’t usually like to recommend brands/products, but this is the exception. If you need a printer, and black and white is all you need, go for this one.
I think the text is somewhat dubious in its arguments, but this (and the arguments built on this assertion) is just plain wrong:
[Signals servers have] a few important pieces of data;
Message dates and times Message senders and recipients (via phone number identifiers)
Signal clients implement the Pond protocol. As a result, Signals servers know who a message is for (obviously, how else do you get the message) but cannot know who it is FROM.
I’ve been playing around with implementing a secure/private messenger demo for myself, and have been consistently impressed with how privacy preserving Signal is when reading their papers and code. I wish it was selfhostable, but apart from that, it’s great.
The server would be NICE to be OSS, but ultimately, privacy breaches are prevented client/protocol side.
That ks for sharing this, this is fascinating.
Maybe the underlying rule is: the more you know about something, the more you are aware of its flaws, making the alternatives you know less about more attractive?


I don’t really know, sorry :(
If you want to migrate, is going conduit - conduwuit - continuwuity (first version) - continuwuity (current version) maybe an option?


I went with continuwuity and am happy with it. Development happens at a steady pace, with sane priorities. The server is stable and I haven’t had any issues to speak of, despite one minor bug that got resolved very quickly after creating an issue.
This doesn’t make a call to government servers.
The app (or desktop application BTW, incl. Linux) reads your national ID’s NFC tag, once. When you need to prove your age, the app locally computes a zkp that only tells the site “at least 18yo yes/no”.
Note that every EU country has a form of national ID, and the digital capabilities of these IDs are already used for a bunch of stuff (e.g. taxes, bank account creation,…). This doesn’t worsen the privacy situation for EU citizens, but instead ensures that no privacy-unfriendly solutions emerge.


This is the one true answer.
Just an IP, nothing else. And easily curlable.
Sorry, I don’t quite follow 😅
What’s the problematic response?