

And shut-in, no-tipping undergrads from coast to coast weep.
Are you expected to tip the fucking robot?


And shut-in, no-tipping undergrads from coast to coast weep.
Are you expected to tip the fucking robot?


The people whom you’re posing the question to (other Lemmy users) aren’t in any position to answer the question, and you (should) know that. Therefore, your “question” wasn’t asked in good faith and was instead merely a rhetorical tool used to “present false or distorted claims by framing them as questions.”
Yes, this tactic is often used by conspiracy theorists, but they don’t have a monopoly on it, as you so clearly demonstrated.


I don’t, which is why I posted my comment as a question.


OP apparently wasn’t paying attention to what they were typing when they originally posted. They have now corrected it.


The tide comes in. The tide goes out.


the fact they still don’t have lidar today is criminal.
That would require the muskrat to experience a moment of self reflection and admit he was wrong about something.


But in reality he is definitely planning on filing this in a local small claims court.
Which is arguably better, because it demonstrates to other people how they too can fight back.


“We started noticing consumers weren’t rewarding polish the way brands thought they were,” said Chookie founder Zev Ziegler
Ummmmm…
One of its AI ads was rife with misspellings and terrifying, googly-eyed chocolate bars. Another of them shows an AI-generated figure producing the cookie bars in what appears to be lab.
I don’t think “polish” means what you think it means, Zev.


Between the comments here and the article itself, there are exactly three mentions of whatever tf it is you’re talking about… all from you.


That appears to be fundamentally false.


From OPs linked article…
In tests involving 197 participants, the researchers said the system identified individuals with nearly 100% accuracy. The recognition remained effective regardless of viewing angle or how the participants walked.


Also, I tried plugging the patch cable directly into my own wifi router and nothing.
The router would need to be explicitly configured to connect to your account on the network, which would require certain information provided by the ISP, which it sounds like they weren’t going to provide.


Yes, but also no. Plenty of people will buy and read these books and watch AI slop movies. Everyone can cook healthy meals at home, and many do, but there’s still a big market for fast food restaurants and prepackaged microwave meals.


Relevant Tangent:
When you try to link two financial accounts (in the US) for the purpose of transferring money from one to the other, and the originating financial institution offers, or in many cases now outright insists you use Plaid (a third party company) to make the connection…
YSK you’re giving Plaid permanent access to all of your financial records on the target account. They can immediately download your entire history and go back whenever they want to get an update.
Sometimes they obfuscate that they’re even using Plaid, so here’s how to tell.
If they “inconveniently” ask for routing and account numbers, and tell you that they’re going to make two small deposits into the target account and that you need to watch for those deposits in the next few days and then come back and enter how much those deposits were to verify that it’s your account, then that is NOT Plaid. This is the version you want!
If, however, they “conviently” jump to a window for you to log into the target account to instantly make the connection, THAT’S Plaid. Once you enter your login info, you’ve just given Plaid permission to paw through your account history and come back to rummage for more whenever they’d like.


it’s not entirely there but damn impressive
Maybe, if you believe they’re actually autonomous and not just being secretly driven remotely.
It will always make one up. Sometimes it may get lucky and the made up one exists and is relevant, but it still just made it up.