Slightly autistic introvert. Love surfing (longboard), design and computer science. Promoting minimalism, simpleliving, downshifting, naturism and slow lifestyle.
Former UX-designer, systems/business analyst and QA-engineer.
They might do the same job. They just do it in a different way. They look differently, they work differently, their key concepts are a bit different, their workspaces and workflows are differently organized. Plus, Logseq is fully open source while Obsidian is not.
It’s not about features. Almost every notetaking app has pretty similar feature set today. I’m talking about the approach in general.
I love Logseq and I’ve been using it for many years. But TBH it’s not an alternative to Obsidian. At all. It’s a differrent app with a differrent approach.
It’s not about idiots :) Corporations and governments just want more control on your life. And “protection from malware” (as well as “child safety”) is just an excuse and manipulation so that human life to increasingly belong to the corporations.
How’s that connected to “selfhosted”. One does not “selfhost” a terminal app
It would be great if someone could have explained the key differrences between this and gnunet/zeronet/hyphanet/SSB
It is ineresting because a man could pretend that he idetifies himself as a woman. What should a driver/passenged do in such a situation?
And the interesting question is what if XY human being identifies itself as a woman?
Doubling this question. With such a price, it could only kill my bank account :)
That’s great. And if something is comfortable for you to use, it doesn’t mean it would be comfortable for the majority of other people.
Maybe you use large screen(s). Maybe your information is not important and/or the interface doesn’t require actions. Context matters.
As a user of 13-inch 2560x1600p screen, I definitely can say that apps need more whitespace to be usable. I’ve also been using 2 monitors 27-inch each some time ago. And yes, such a configuration allows for a greater density of information on the screen.
That’s why I say (again): information density must be comfortable for humans. In their contexts of course.
Information density MUST be suitable for humans. Usability and productivity both have nothing in common with amount of clicking and scrolling required.
Just imagine making your font size something about 5px. And 1.0 as a line height. Sounds good, isn’t it? There ia so much information displayed on the screen.
I suggest you to install them both and take a look. Or even better - use them both side by side for a while ;)