If the ingredients are good, you don’t actually need to do that. Good cheese has nice taste that will go away if you melt it. Same as onions actually. Same with bread.
- 0 Posts
- 442 Comments
But you did read the post, right? You understand what we’re talking about here, right?
Nalivai@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•FBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode EnabledEnglish
11·2 days agoDo we know of instances them doing it? Assuming they can, I don’t actually know.
I know we like to spread misinformation online on this here .ml instance, but that might be too much even for you. Also, everyone knows that the war technicality started in 2014 when putin did the first invasion, I don’t even understand what kind of gotcha that might be
And you think “brittish food bad and bland” is some kind of revolutionary humour here?
Zigbee is a communication protocol. The way your bulb reacts to a powercycle is up to a bulb. Mine remember last settings for example.
Yeah, I bet those grapes are sour af and require account to actually eat
Imagine having a bulb that you can’t change the colour of at will.
Yeah, poor people are notoriously sober
A lot of these are filler. It’s an add for a specific product disguised as one of this endless lists, but they couldn’t stop themselves from being obvious
Are we doing ads now here? And are we, like, OK with it now?
Oh, I love competency porn! My favourite is Martian, both the book and the movie.
Nalivai@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Meta's latest subscription move is an attempt to offset its AI betsEnglish
5·8 days agoWhatsApp has this weird grip on my country’s people, it’s insane.
They don’t owe the requester any consideration.
That’s not true, but would be bad if it was. Communication always should be two-way considerate, otherwise we will quickly descend to hell.
Regardless it’s not unreasonable to expect you to your fucking ducks in a row before you bother people.
It’s also not unreasonable to expect that you’ll be able to quickly answer if you’re open to communication.
You’re going to have to provide the information anyway.
Or don’t if it’s time sensitive and you’re not answering. Context, nuances, remember?
Yeah, well, in which case reading five words is even less of a task, and if it’s a struggle for you go finish fifth grade.
Everyone is entitled to their own time, you’re not the center of the universe. Right now you’re way past a normal consideration, you’re demanding that everyone sacrifices all the convenience however small, so you don’t have to sacrifice any.
If you’re busy af, you can respond “busy right now, sorry”, we just discovered that typing takes no time so it’s OK. If you’re busy but not that busy, and someone asks do you have some time, you can always answer “depends, what’s the question?”, which also takes no time from you, so it’s OK once again.
That’s the whole thing about two-way communication, it’s actually as flexible as people are, which is just great if you’re one of those peoples. Personally, I chose to be maximally considerate, and I always type as much as possible so there is as little mental effort required on the other side of the conversation. But that’s because I’m a no-life shmuck, and I (maybe actually in big part because of that) doesn’t actually value my time and it’s not worth much. If I had any self-respect, I would be way more pushy about my time, and there would be times where I start conversation with “hi, can you talk right now?” instead of two paragraphs of formatted text
If you look at it from other perspective, typing the whole paragraph of details just to be ghosted can also feel disrespectful as fuck, while “Hi, can you talk right now?” is actually pretty normal.
There is no easy and universal answer, it’s all depends on context and the situation, just like anything else in human communication.
The objectively correct from a selfish perspective here, is to send “ping” and only type out the whole request if you respond. Yeah, it will make you wait, but it will save me time and mental effort at typing all that, knowing that it’s all for nothing if you will not respond in time.
The correct answer here is to do “Hi, need to talk to you about [thing], are you available right now?”, but it’s technically speaking only one step above this hateful “Hi”
You assume that everyone is replaceable and you can just message whatever to whomever.
It’s a handshake. If you’re out of the office or otherwise can’t respond, it saves them from typing the whole message, they can do it only if they know you’re responding.
It’s still offloading the inconvenience to you a bit, but at least it’s rational for them



On the other hand, your idea of a scientific process is par for the course for a clankerfucker