

Check the young republicans (or whatever they’re called) chat that leaked yesterday. I’m sure you’ll find plenty in there.


Check the young republicans (or whatever they’re called) chat that leaked yesterday. I’m sure you’ll find plenty in there.
Ah yes. Just what God would want - for you to rip families apart and destroy lives because they have brown skin and maybe didn’t fill out some paperwork.


His main points were that you can see the body armor bounce when slowing the video way down, and that the caliber used would’ve blown his neck open, not just pierce the skin leaving a small, clean hole.
I think I already mentioned that I don’t know shit about guns, so my reply to that was, “huh.”


Where can I find more information on this? I heard the same info from a right wing coworker I have conversations with occasionally. He’s real big into guns so what he said sounded legit to me as a not gun enthusiast.
This one in particular is good for making ham soup with thanksgiving leftovers. They print a recipe on the packaging.


For iPhone you can make a simple shortcut to do this. Here’s what it would look like:



He would have known they were going to make him take his shoes off and so tried something else instead that would probably have been more likely to work.
Oh?
I don’t think anything is more likely to work.
Ok.
So all the additional security measures that have been added over the years have been pointless, and not a result of us learning from our mistakes. Got it.
just like they aren’t capable of preventing any mass killings
They haven’t had the same reaction to mass killings as they’ve had to terrorist attacks on planes. Nothing changes from those mass killings except we get more thoughts and prayers nowadays. They never made people start taking their guns off (or were able to enforce it) after mass killings.
The only thing that could work is creating an overall situation in society where people are less motivated to do it, not preventing specific acts.
Yea… we are doing the opposite of that right now with the current administration. And now shoes are valid hiding places again…. Yippee-ki-yay


We can speculate about what could’ve happened instead all day, but that doesn’t change the fact that what he actually did was hide a bomb in his shoe, and this would have prevented that specifically.
I’m actually curious what you think would have been more likely to work?


It would’ve prevented the guy we’re both talking about from sneaking a bomb on the plane in his shoe.
I don’t think they’re taking it away now because they don’t think it helps. I think they’re taking it away because people don’t like doing it.
Maybe they think the number of people who will try that again is low. Maybe they have other ways of detecting something like that now. Who knows.


No, there was actually a case years ago (not too long after 9-11) of a man bringing a bomb on a plane in his shoe. Passengers stopped him as he tried to light it on the plane.
IIRC that’s when they started making people take off their shoes. I could be wrong about that part but that’s how I remember it.


The defective ones are made by Ankler. The good ones are made by Anker.
You’re still missing the fact that OP has XL selected.
It’s recommending L because OP has XL selected.
And presumably, people who typically order XL end up exchanging the XL for L.
It 100% makes total sense.
They use AI to summarize reviews already, it isn’t far fetched to assume they are also using AI for this recommendation as well.
Yes, but they have to give you what’s on the tag. So even if it runs large they have to give you an L if you ask for an L.
I don’t think it’s that ambiguous. They tell you why it’s recommended. If they get a lot of returns for this item and customers typically end up with the next size down, and lots of reviews say they run big, it makes sense for them to suggest that and tell you why they’re suggesting that.
This is also them telling you this information while letting you know it’s based on other people’s feedback, not coming directly from Amazon themselves.
Recommended size based on millions of orders and reviews, not what size it thinks you are.
It’s saying this item runs big. You have XL selected so it’s recommending sizing down to L.
It’s not that crazy.


So we gave them a nuke abortion?


Judge: “I sentence @[email protected] to life in jail for making a comment on the internet.”
You: “That’s some bullshit”
Judge: “yes, I agree that’s just meaningless talk”
Weird how it made no sense, yet you understood exactly what they were saying.
Immediate as in you could start the process immediately vs. waiting weeks or months to have a sleep study done and getting CPAP.
Seeing noticeable results aren’t immediate, but you can absolutely start working on your calorie deficit immediately.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but all this switch does is make adds relevant/not relevant to you. It doesn’t stop whatever data is needed to make it work, does it?