• Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Id argue the otherwise.

    Based on the hair being unhygienic point of view.

    With modern soap and washing capabilities, it’s rather easy to keep oneself clean, even with long hair. So shaving everything off serves no purpose, just extra work for no benefit.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      just extra work for no benefit

      You can swim faster and your skin dries faster. Can speedrun showers basically

      • Velma@lemmy.todaydeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not enough of a difference to counter the amount of time it takes to stay hairless.

          • Velma@lemmy.todaydeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re vastly overestimating how much time one “saves” from being hairless.