• Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but Europe is sliding into fascism too, just not as quickly. Regulating capitalism treats the symptoms and not the disease, and so it can only ever bring temporary relief. The problems we are experiencing now are not the product of a broken system, they are the inevitable result of capitalist economics, no matter how restrained.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Fascism vs communism is a prime example of a false dichotomy. Those are definitely the only two options.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 hours ago

          This is nothing more than a feeling that you have, and has no basis in fact. All the worst atrocities committed in the name of communism throughout history cannot possibly compare in scale or cruelty to the actions of even a single fascist state.

          In addition to the difference in scale there is a difference in motive. Communists have noble goals, but atrocities result from threat-induced paranoia and selfish opportunists co-opting revolutionary fervor. The atrocities of fascism are pure evil in both motive and action. Fascists seek to eliminate those that they deem inferior, and they carry this out with unimaginable cruelty and glee.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          This is 100% ahistorical, Communism has historically served the working class and opposed fascism while fascism has historically served Capitalists and oppressed workers and Communists. Read Blackshirts and Reds.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 hours ago

            “Totalitarianism” as a term was largely popularized in order to depict Communism and Nazism as “twin evils,” when the reality is that Socialist countries have had dramatic democratization of the economy.

            • Jonas@mastodon.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              37 minutes ago

              @Cowbee @memes might be true, but by definition (A system of government in which the people have virtually no authority and the state wields absolute control) my comment is correct

                • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 minutes ago

                  With such a straightforward definition of ‘totalitarianism’, one could argue that Imperial America is totalitarian.

                  We can find much evidence for the dictatorship of the proletariat in the U.S.S.R., as

                  The [Kremlin] regularly urged its people to criticize local conditions and their leaders, at least below a certain exalted level. For example, in March 1937 Stalin emphasized the importance of the party’s ‘ties to the masses’. To maintain them, it was necessary ‘to listen carefully to the voice of the masses, to the voice of rank and file members of the party, to the voice of the so-called “little people”, to the voice of ordinary folk [narod]’.¹⁷ The party newspaper Pravda went so far as to identify lack of criticism with enemies of the people: ‘Only an enemy is interested in seeing that we, the Bolsheviks […] do not notice actual reality […] Only an enemy […] strives to put the rose-coloured glasses of self-satisfaction over the eyes of our people.’¹⁸

                  (Source. Click here for more.)