• howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      For the same reason I’d attend a meeting and complain afterwards that it could’ve been an email, despite knowing that I was going into a meeting.

      I think it’s reasonable to expect the video formats to only be used when it’s a good medium for communicating whatever it’s communicating.

      • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean some people prefer watching videos than reading articles, I think it’s fair to post a video and it’s fair for you to not prefer it as well.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        15min is a reasonable amount of time for a video describing the full implications of the prosecutions actions. As well as how the case has tangibly changed policy.

        Grow an attention span

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      People who post articles provide a summary of the article. So maybe you should post a video summarizing the video you think we should watch?