• Fleur__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As someone not interested in star wars I can’t wait for in ten 10 years time when suddenly liking the sequel trilogy is cool just like how the prequels were hated then became cool to like.

    It’s like poetry, it rhymes

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The prequels are bad movies. But they tell an interesting story and have a unique setting. The sequels are also bad movies, but they’re a disjointed chaotic mess that just rehashes the original trilogy. There’s nothing to redeem.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The prequels are pretty solid outside of maybe the middle of Attack of the clones. The lightsaver battles and special effects are way better

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there’s a difference between how they were hated and what parts people liked.

      The prequels people hate because Jar-Jar, and some other comic relief characters, were annoying, and also (especially episode 1) how slow they can be. Overall, the stories were liked I think.

      The sequels people like for the action and entertainment, but you totally have to ignore the story for them to not fall apart. It constantly contradicts itself (and the existing lessons, like the OP) and only works to weaken the universe.

      Basically, their opposites to each other. I think the difference is people can come to enjoy the world of the prequels and get past the bad bits (or skip them), but the analysis and growing recognition of the failures of the sequels will only get larger with time as we spend more time with them.