• dev_null@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doubled down? After being called out they slowed the upload cadence, are taking more time to make sure mistakes don’t get through, and changed their production process. They also formed a volunteer team of “beta tester” viewers who see each video pre-release to catch any mistakes they didn’t internally. I think they handled it well. Of course it would be better if they didn’t have a problem in the first place, but I’d never call it “doubling down”.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doubled down?

      Yes, doubled down. After being called out Linus made two separate long posts about why he wasn’t wrong.

      They also formed a volunteer team of “beta tester” viewers who see each video pre-release

      So using free labour instead of just doing their jobs? If they can’t “catch any mistakes internally”, then they’re just bad at their jobs (which they are).

      I think they handled it well.

      Yes, the PR team they used gave them a good corporate playbook to work with.

      “Slowed the upload cadence” is just another way to say “wait for this to blow over”.

      I used to watch LTT, mostly because it was interesting from the “let’s see what those guys have to say”. I had zero interest in their technical expertise because, well, they don’t really have any. They’ve always been clowns, but after their storage server video and their Linux “challenge” I lost all respect for any talent or knowledge they claimed to have. After the Billet Labs incident I lost any shred of respect I had for them.

      They are clowns.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You live in a fantasy world if you think it’s possible to catch 100% of mistakes internally. Even safety critical equipment with many layers of checks fails and kills people every now and then (medical equipment, bridges).

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You live in a fantasy world if you think it’s possible to catch 100% of mistakes internally.

          Nice strawman. No one said anything about catching 100% of mistakes internally. But outsourcing that work to unpaid volunteers with zero verification of qualifications is the definition of “passing the buck”.

          The correct answer is to hire and train up a QA team.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            No one said they are unpaid or have zero qualifications either.