From: Alejandro Colomar <alx-AT-kernel.org>

Hi all,

As you know, I’ve been maintaining the Linux man-pages project for the last 4 years as a voluntary. I’ve been doing it in my free time, and no company has sponsored that work at all. At the moment, I cannot sustain this work economically any more, and will temporarily and indefinitely stop working on this project. If any company has interests in the future of the project, I’d welcome an offer to sponsor my work here; if so, please let me know.

Have a lovely day! Alex

  • Findmysec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought AGPL was the more restrictive version of GPL? Which license should we use so that corporates need to pay?

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It is my understanding that the only difference applies to hosted software. For example, Lemmy is AGPL. If it were GPL, then a company could take the source code, modify it and host their own version without open sourcing their modifications. AGPL extends to freedoms of GPL to users of hosted software as well.

      A real example of this would be truth social which is modified Mastodon and as AGPL those modifications are required to be open source as well.