• xep@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It makes no sense that a living creature would not have a system in place to detect and avoid harm. Whether we see it as suffering from our point of view or not is irrelevant.

    Will you stop eating those too?

    I can and have. The primary thing that should inform one on what to eat is and should always be nutrition.

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can and have You… don’t eat plants and mushrooms anymore? What kind of diet is left then?

      It’s the same with plants, they too react to stimuli, that’s how they avoid harm. Like how some plants become “soft” in the face of harsh weather to avoid breaking. Or others physically move. If you cut a plant but not fully, you can see the plant try to repair it. How is this any different from a brain-less animal reacting to its stimuli?

      • xep@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t see avoiding suffering as a tenable or even meaningful way of deciding what to eat, and so I choose based on the effects of what I put inside my body. I eat only animal sourced foods.

        How is this any different from a brain-less animal reacting to its stimuli?

        I don’t think it is any different at all. A narrow definition of “suffering” is reductionist and inadequate.

        • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean I agree, I’m all for a plant-based diet for health reasons. But most vegans out there, including the one I was responding to, only use suffering as their argument. Here the part I disagreed with was the “always morally wrong” blanket statement.