• kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not even that. It is a ban of any engine that produces carbon dioxide emissions. So combustion engines are fine as long as the fuel source is carbon neutral.

    Turns out e-fuels are economically unviable? Well, make them viable if you love combustion engines so much. It’s also not a horse-propelled-engine ban, the consumer just does not want horses ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. The allmighty invisible hand of the free market has spoken!

    • Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      IIRC the original diesel engine was designed to run on peanut oil or something. Would that also create CO2 emissions?

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Technically yes, as burning organic matter will produce carbon dioxide. But in the sense of the law no, as the peanuts capture as much CO2 as they emit. I think that is the hypothetical “magic” in efuels.