• Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    -Listens to what he means when he is speaking -Pays attention to his nonverbal cues about his emotional state -Respects his boundaries and only assists him in expanding them, not demanding he do so -Rewards him for engaging in new healthy behaviours that he finds uncomfortable

    Fellas, is it being an asshole for checks notes engaging with your partner?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the concern would be generating a Pavlovian response to her presence instead of genuine desire to be with her, but I don’t even know what that really means because our animal brains aren’t rational. There isn’t a such thing as “genuine” in this context because it’s all based on emotions. Should you not have sex with your partner because it can make them feel attached, for example?

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, this person isn’t disrespectfully treating a human as they would a dog, they’re just respectfully treating dogs as they would a human.

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Intent matters, and methods matter. But I think what the friend is missing is that the methods aren’t bad; op is using methods developed from scientific analysis of abused animals with the intent to ethically care for them. Coming back to intent, she clearly wants to help this guy who her training is identifying as having some kind of background of abuse. The methods might be a little crude in the sense that they were developed for animals and not for people (who are animals, but animals with several distinct qualities from other animals, like the ability to communicate complex ideas), and there are different, more well-adapted methods for people, but they’re only crude in comparison to those modern human-focused methods. They’re still quite effective, and I would still consider them ethical for use on humans when paired with an altruistic intent, which she seems to be conveying. As long as she still views the guy as fully a person, a peer, then I see nothing wrong here.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Many people apparently loving this, I see it as a red flag. She’s manipulative and I’d second guess every action she’d take from the day I noticed it

    Edit: funny that people are down voting this, I guess they want to be manipulated by their partners.

    Take it from someone who divorced a manipulative partner, it’s not cool them all the time lying pushing and manipulating you to be the way they want you to be.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Me, reading title: “WTF?!? That’s messed up!”

    Me, after reading the post: “I’m so fucking jealous.”

  • MBM@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is probably a me thing, but if I were to catch on to someone doing this I might start wondering at some hidden intent behind everything they do