• Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    4 days ago

    For your security we’re going to block your access to FOSS and apps that let you avoid our ads. This is totally not a business decision. Pinky swear.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      and avoid our datamining capabilities, and the intrusive AI we keep pushing on unwanted customers. we knew thier android core app(spyware) was the first step. they probably want that to permanantly installed into everyones phone.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    4 days ago

    Google says it’s no different than checking IDs at the airport.

    You’re not a fucking airport, Google!

  • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    226
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wait, what the hell?

    I can’t believe this, who the hell are they to decide what I should install?

    They are welcome to curate their own store, but sideloading concerns only the user.

    Hopefully, the EU and other jurisdictions block this.

    Fucking corrupt American oligarchs.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      The EU can’t even distribute their own apps without Play Integrity. Seems unlikely they will care.

  • Coopr8@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    No one talking about how this could completely annihilate open source .apk development? First off the lead dev has to get identity verified to get a key, which will reduce the number of devs willing to push through friction to start a project. Then when the key is issued and it is posted to the repository, what keeps anyone from grabbing it and using it for another repo? We’ll they have an official app registration of some kind, ok, what about version control? Does every new version have to be registered before it can be loaded and tested? Same for forks?

    This is about to be a terrible mess, Google is assassinating FOSS with this.

    • Awkwardparticle@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      It will kill everyone that is playing around with the phones. I have done a couple mobile projects where I just sideloaded the package I created to quickly test it and to demo it to people. Now that I can’t do that why would I develop for your platform by choice.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      You distribute the code without your key and a built package that is signed. This isn’t exactly rocket science.

      Anyone who forks the code will have to use their own key to install a package they built.

      It’s just unnecessary red tape.

      • kureta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s just unnecessary red tape.

        Which will reduce the number of people using foss apks, which will in turn, reduce the motivation, and then the number, of foss apk developers.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Fdroid itself and every package they host will have to be signed.

          Maybe there are still workarounds, like enabling dev mode on your phone, but still tedious.

  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    4 days ago

    Google says it’s no different than checking IDs at the airport

    What, and Google is now the TSA? Fuck that shit. I’ve paid for my device, I get to do whatever the hell I want with it!

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      4 days ago

      Okay, let’s check ids wherever you leave the house, since that’s the sane as checking them at the airport.

      Papers please, right?

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d argue those aren’t the same. ID is checked at the airport for legal entry into another country and the security is on both sides. A lot of countries don’t require people to carry or present ID while walking around in their own country short of a crime having been committed.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        google likely has that data already, use any of thier apps, they got it, searching on google, taking pictures, emails.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I can’t say anything for the Reddit part of what you said but I agree with Google’s unethical datamining. It’s no secret what Google has been doing. I remember when the tinfoil-hat-wearers were warning people about those nifty little Google speakers people were generously inviting into their homes, telling them to watch what they were saying in the general vicinity of the speakers, that Google could be using them to listen to every conversation. The naysayers said “They wouldn’t do that, that’d be illegal. The speaker only listens when I say ‘Hey Google’ and they wouldn’t be saving what I say anyway!”. Lo and behold, it finally got leaked that was wrong, that the speakers were listening 24/7 and Google was keeping everything. I could be wrong but I recall something going around that Google even admitted they were keeping the recordings. Suddenly the conversation died down, there was no lawsuit for espionage or any such thing and the naysayers suddenly converted to “I’ve got nothing to hide, I don’t care if I’m being recorded”. Ignorance remains forever blissful, it would seem.

        Quick note for the pedantic: No, it’s not just Google. Amazon, Apple and Microsoft are doing it too. If there’s a microphone in your house, be mindful of what you’re saying around it; you never know how an innocuous conversation might be used against you.

    • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve paid for my device, I get to do whatever the hell I want with it!

      You bought a phone but is leasing the software. It’s not yours to do with as you please.

      Have you considered using fully open source android versions?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        The few options that exist (along with their negatives) can’t be installed on my phone. N20U is still pretty much locked down.

        • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Then do what I do when buying your next phone, find a custom ROM you like, check their “comparability” page, find devices that are fully compatible, preferably officially supported (community build usually work fine as well) and use that as a shopping list when browsing for phones.

      • Panini@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Open source Android is a thing??? TIL that might be my solution to this long term since I sideload apps regularly.

        • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just be mindful of what ROM you’re putting on your device. That ROM can still have access to everything you have on there so it should be a source you trust.

        • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Search for your device name and “custom ROM” to see what’s out there. Some are completely Google free, others retain different levels of Google play support, including downloading existing purchases.

      • zarenki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        No custom ROM on a recent smartphone technically gives you a fully open source Android system when they rely on vendor-provided proprietary blobs in order for basic hardware functionality to work at all. Unless you want to go without a modem, GPS, and likely more depending on your model, at which point it’s functionally no longer a smartphone.

        Open-source custom ROMs are at least far more open-source than the alternative in most of the ways that matter most, including the ability to change the code in order to remove app installation restrictions, to avoid Google’s telemetry, etc.

        • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Would the proprietary blobs in the baseband hardware stop the end user from installing software, which is the topic of concern?

          If no, is this a irrelevant “achtually”-reply?

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d argue it’s worth knowing what you risk losing from your device in the name of sideloading software so it’s not irrelevant to point out your phone might not be a phone by the end of the procedure.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    So Android is pointless now?
    No, really. If I’m gonna be dragged kicking and screaming into the walled garden, why would I go with Google’s joke of an ecosystem instead of much nicer and better integrated Apple garden?

    I might as well start carrying one of those weird branded ultra-tiny laptops from AliExpress and some used, older iPhone for the 2 apps I need.
    Fuck it. Throw out the baby, the bathwater, the bathtub, the whole damn thing. Fuuuuck it.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      i have a feeling that google largely gave up on making a decent phone for a while, all they want is your data, plus to put thier AI into everything to offset the cost of using AI.

      • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        To be fair, they never cared about making a decent phone. They have always just wanted your data. They are a marketing company and you are the product up for sale.

  • Drew@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    The android dream is over. It was fun while it lasted. My next phone will be linux

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    4 days ago

    The current trends and direction of tech is making me want to become Amish…

    I’m getting so fucking sick of everything turning into shit, what’s even the point of fucking point anymore? This is borderline kernel level enshitification

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Amish that I grew up near were big into shunning, child marriage, sexual abuse, not talking to the cops, and lots of drugs.

      I’m just saying it might be easier to switch to open source or something.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Google has been been cracking down on installing .apk’s on your phone for years and they’re getting more and more aggressive about it. It’s not a question of if they’ll disallow it completely, but when.

    It’s already extremely tedious. Back in the Android 2.3 days (oh, good old Gingerbread) you could just get an APK and install it, but those times are long gone.

    Years ago they threatened the developer of Total Commander to remove his app from the PlayStore unless he patched out an APK install feature, so he was forced to do that.

    Now another example: Try to install eBay on a phone that is not passing device integrity. It is not listed on the PlayStore because your device doesn’t pass safety checks. You can grab an APK and install it, but the OS will check if the app has been installed through the PlayStore and if it hasn’t, it will complain and close itself.

    GrapheneOS has patched that bullshit out, btw.

    And this behaviour happens with all apps where the developer has enabled the “App Integrity” option, which is heavily pushed as a super-great security feature. So developers might just enable that feature, not being fully aware of the implications.

    As you can see, it’s one method at a time, slowly but surely, until Google fully controls the ecosystem. The intention behind that is pretty clear: They don’t want people to have AdAway and Revanced, they want money and user data. And they also want you to login to the PlayStore, get hooked on their stupid daily points challenges and spend your hard-earned money on virtual crap.

    This is textbook enshittification, it will only get worse from here on.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, need them hardware manufacturers too.
      We would have plenty of Linux phones if drivers were open sauce or even just available closed sauce.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    only malware i have read about on android have came from google’s oh so safe store.