The company is Access Industries and the Founder and Owner is Leonard Blavatnik

Along with what’s in the title, he is accused of reputation laundering against Ukraine and has been personally sanctioned by Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He was also part of a WhatsApp group involving some of the United States’ most powerful business leaders with the stated goals of “changing the narrative” in favour of Israel and “helping win the war” against Gaza.

Everything is in the linked Wikipedia article about him, mostly under the “Controversies and disputes” part.

I switched to Deezer after seeing it recommended as a better Spotify alternative here on Lemmy, but after finding all this I immediately stopped using it. It’s as bad as the shit Spotify does and has done IMO. I’m not here to recommend or push an alternative, but if I can give info on what I use now if someone asks.

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Qobuz is awesome and still 100% french. Also the platform which pays artists better then spotify

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Thanks, I’ll prefer Bandcamp.

      Now seriously: Does Qobuz have a equal catalog to Spotify and a bigger/more mainstream catalog than Bandcamp?

      • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, Qobuz is significantly more mainstream than BandCamp. I don’t know if the catalogue is on par with Spotify or AM or whatever, but most popular music is on it.

        Bandcamp is like an indie zine that occasionally ships with a burned CD from a local band that has to live in the same rented house with no A/C and a half empty bottle of makers mark in the fridge.

        Qobuz is a record store.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    None of the online music streamers are ethical. Every single one, to varying degrees, robs the artists and enriches their CEO’s and shareholders.

    Do the ethical thing.

    Don’t use them, and instead, use a Youtube-to-MP3 converter and steal the music.

    • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Bandcamp is pretty good, though. Especially on Bandcamp Fridays where all the profits go to the artists. Plus, I like getting FLACs.

      • citizensongbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        Problem with Bandcamp is they got bought out, first by Epic Games and then by Songtradr, and each time it’s gone through enshittification. Bandcamp Fridays used to be a weekly thing but got changed to quarterly with little announcement, and then half their staff got laid off to pad the bottom line. Even with all that they’re better than the alternatives, but they’re still on a decaying trajectory.

        • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah I agree with all of this. Shame there isn’t a better option at the moment, but they’re the lesser of a bunch of evils - so I guess I’m sticking with them for a bit longer.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Absolutely. At the end of the day the main point here is just don’t use the major streaming services.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Are you under the impression that this will pay any artist anything?

      It’s fine to take a pro-piracy stance, but pretending that you’re doing it out of concern for the artists is grade A-bullshit.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        You’re right.

        I should figure out a way to replace the income these artists get for my individual stream. It comes out to fractions upon fractions of a penny.

        The point here is robbing the CEO. There’s no meaningful impact to the artist (unless you’re Taylor Swift) thanks to the way these services are structured.

        • threeduck@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I have some music on streaming services, and get a couple of coins every month. If you pirate my music instead, I’ll get nothing.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 days ago

            Set up a Patreon and offer exclusive music content to subscribers, sell directly to fans through Bandcamp. With good marketing and social media presence you would get several times what any streaming service will pay you ever. Even if most people are pirating your music. If you are being pirated, you are worth listening to, and that means that people are willing to pay you something. I tell this to all aspiring musicians, companies are not your friend, labels are not your buddies. The pirate is not your enemy, the megabillionaire monopolistic corp is. Many musicians owe their popularity because a music pirate put their stuff online and got them noticed.

            • overload@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Are you suggesting in the end here that music pirates are paying artists in exposure? Musicians really can’t catch a break SMH

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Not at all, that’s a straw man attack and a complete misread of my comment. Acquire reading comprehension skills then come back if you can come up with a non bad-faith comment.

    • bigb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Go a step further and use something like Deemix to grab FLAC files from their servers

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I’ve already addressed this. They don’t get fractions of fractions of a penny.

        We know this because Weird Al used his year-end video to make the world aware that, in return for his tens of millions of streams, he got around $80.00 from Spotify for a whole year.

        The artists aren’t losing anything meaningful when rip songs off Youtube, but the CEO is for sure, at least he would if we all did this.

        • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          If you mean that video where he talked about getting $12 for 80 million streams…he was very clearly taking the piss.

          He made closer to $200k, which is still pretty low (hence, the joke) and doesn’t account for his labels cut.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          We know this because Weird Al used his year-end video to make the world aware that, in return for his tens of millions of streams, he got around $80.00 from Spotify for a whole year.

          How does that work? 10 million Spotify streams should pay more than $20k in royalties.

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I dunno, Qobuz seems pretty fucking solid, and still allows for purchasing your music directly in FLAC and other formats. What drama is there about them?

    • Mamdani_Da_Savior@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      As a fan I kinda view the music business this way

      • Your music brings me in
      • You make money off selling ads on your videos and content and platforms
      • You make money selling merch
      • You make money doing shows
      • You MIGHT make a little streaming, but it won’t be much

      That’s how I see it.

      • DirtPuddleMisfortune@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        I saw a documentary one, and one artist said: back in the days, you made shows to sell your music (vinyl, later CDs), but now you make music to go on tour and make shows.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    you guys need to understand that there are no goodguy rich folk

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    YSK he’s ukrainian and has since decades lived in the west, US/Shitrael.
    He’s a jewish zionist POS.
    So he’s a western oligarch, but don’t let facts keep you from blaming ‘the Russians’

    • KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      YSK that he grew up in Yaroslavl, Russia to Russian-speaking Jewish parents. Calling him “Ukrainian” just because he was born in Odesa during the Soviet Union is misleading. He had/has close ties to the Russian state and became wealthy off of Russian oil and aluminium deposits in the 90s.

      So yes, you can blame “the Russians”, but you should rather blame the system.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        He emigrated to the US in 1978.
        He has dual US/UK citizenship,like many horrible zionists. Studied at Columbia.
        “became wealthy off of Russian oil and aluminium deposits in the 90s.”
        Like many western oligarch who leeched the ex-soviet states under Gorbachev and Yeltzin, the sell outs.
        These are facts, completely ridiculous to demonise Russia for this american-brit POS just bcs he has Russian roots.
        " but you should rather blame the system."
        What system?
        If you mean the US/UK horrible imperialist and colonial warmongers and genocide supporters causing misery in the world then yes.
        Glad they are circling the drain, their time is over.
        You can cry about evil Russia, China or whatever, that won’t change reality.

        • KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          You know what’s completely ridiculous? Your black or white view of the world. Reality is that there is no benevolent state or any kind of financially succesful entity that isn’t built on some form of exploitation. The Western system is evil. So is Russia for sure. China. UAE and the Saudis. You have India now rising by building strong ties with USA and Israel. There’s no geopolitical force that’s built on good. That you’re incapable of realising that and just go “West bad so everyone else good” is quite telling about you. Besides, Russian Jews - strongly overrepresented in the oligarchs statistics - traditionally have strong ties to the Israeli state and Zionism. Russia’s - like everyone else’s - current interests are only based on what they perceive to be the most gainful. If Putin could’ve benefitted from siding with Israel instead of the China-Iran-Assad axis he would’ve done so immediately. To even suggest that Russia is anti-Zionist out of benevolence is insane.

          Besides you now say he has “Russian roots” but right before you were attempting to convince people that he was “Ukrainian”. So

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            There is no discussion which one is the evil one.
            The US (and vasals) with it’s eternal wars, meddling and regime changes, 800 bases around the world threatening their enemies.
            Or Russia, that had no choice but to react against NATO and their expansion right up to the border with the inevitability of nukes too close to defend against.
            Oh no, they’re so horrible!
            Really give it up, the majority of the world doesn’t give a fuck about the western russophobia and knows who’s at fault.
            Asia, Africa or S-America know who to xhose between Russia, China or ‘the west’ who have done nothing their entire existance but colonialism and leeching.
            Now go cry somewhere else, you bore me and haven’t got a leg to stand on.
            Might as well be shilling for Shitrael, which I also have no tolerance for.
            Blocking you.

            • KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Don’t you tell me Russia hasn’t been waging wars. That’s an insane statement. Even looking past Ukraine, since the breakdown of the Russian Empire 2.0 (aka the Soviet Union) Russia has invaded Georgia twice, Transnistria, Chechnya twice, and Dagestan, as well as having upheld Al-Assad’s regime - don’t tell me that guy isn’t evil even if he stood up to Israel - and are now heavily involved in Burkina Faso, Mali, and the CAR. Now do you want to talk about all the shit Russia got up to between 1920 - 1991? Or the countless genocides of the Russian Empire as well as the continuous oppression of ethnic minorities in the Caucasus and Siberia, including using them as human meat shields in Ukraine?

              The West deserves hate, but so does Russia. Don’t be a tankie idiot. No one is choosing Russia because Russia isn’t that important anymore. Others are choosing China and that makes sense.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Get Tidal instead

    Or better yet buy directly from the artist

    I don’t understand the mental gymnastics some people do to reach the conclusion that piracy is the “ethical thing” to do. What about the artists? How is that any better for us? If you all pirate then we go from getting peanuts to getting nothing.

    In fact, piracy sort of birthed streaming in the first place. There were Limewire and Napster, then streaming platforms came along to basically legalize piracy… Hell, the Spotify CEO used to be the CEO of uTorrent

    People used to upload pirated music to YouTube. So you know what happened? YouTube came up with their song detection system that now pays artists when their track is streamed, even if it was uploaded by someone else. Even if it plays in the background of a vlog. See what I mean? Legalized piracy.

    PS: I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh no what will Taylor Swift do? Pirating from someone with $30 versus $2 billion are 2 very different things, bud. Plus non megastar artists typically make more of their money from things like performances and merch these days.

      • queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        the megastars aren’t the ones we care about making money, they’re fine. it’s the 99% of the rest of the artists that either get screwed by the labels or are independent and rely on fan support

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well if you only listen to Taylor Swift then that’s valid, but most people have a more diverse music taste so for them this doesn’t apply. The artists I personally listen to (and the labels they’re signed to) are often relatively small and genuine, and to them every bit of income is appreciated. Obviously merch, shows, and direct music sales help more, but getting paid more by streaming services sure would help a great deal as well.

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    I switched to Deezer because I found reasons why all of the others were unethical. What would you suggest for a streaming service whose services are ethical?

    • weaselsrippedmyflesh@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I would personally suggest Qobuz, as it is demonstrably the service that pays artists the most and has multiple tiers of lossless audio options. The next best thing would be to buy from artists directly, whenever possible (maybe even physical media, if you have a good sound system for that).

      People here advocating for piracy sound cute, but I wonder how actual musicians would feel about that.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Pirate everything. Pay directly to artists only when they allow you to do so (like direct sales on their website). If they don’t allow you to make money go to them without also paying pigs then don’t pay them at all.

      • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        i wish people would understand that copyright and the entire existing economic system built around art are all intended to oppress the little guy.

        i think getting a grip on what you just said here is probably the first sort of real step in that direction for people.

        can’t even count the number of times i’ve had someone respond to me with some variation of “oh so you don’t care about the artists’ WORK/LABOR/BALLS then, do you??” as some sort of accusation because i said something negative about copyright… when that’s not remotely the case - for me it’s based in a sentiment very similar to this ethos here regarding piracy. to me, the brain dead people rabidly defending a system where leeches can MitM artists and their clients are the ones who don’t care about artists or their work.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        What options are there for pirating music? I felt Lidarr was not particularly useful due to the lack of indexers. Unless you like mainstream music it’s quite difficult to find many tracks online (and I’m too picky to be okay with YouTube rips).

        Considering music streaming isn’t fragmented in the same way video streaming is, it’s still well worth paying for a music streaming service as part of a family plan imo. There’s no other hassle free solution to instantly listen to anything I want and be recommended new tracks based on my listening preferences.

        I don’t think there’s any particularly “ethical” option, until now I’ve just used Spotify knowing that they’re losing money anyway. But it turns out they posted their first profitable year last year so who knows what the move is now. Qobuz claims to be ethical and high quality, but I don’t know how good the library is and like with any company they can become evil later.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m autistic. If I’m not using some kind of a subscription service I will end up listening to the same one song on repeat literally thousands of times until I hate it. I would prefer to not hate songs I used to love. It’s happened too much. I need some kind of service to introduce new music into my rotation.

        • dropped_packet@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Download thousands of songs. Use a service like Lidarr to automatically download new releases or import entire genres using MusicBrainz collections

  • FackCurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    I literally switched from Spotify yesterday…

    Everyone says bandcamp is a good alternative but the main added value from streaming services, for me, is discovery. I don’t think I can afford the time to go on bandcamp and download every song I like one by one. I would also be lost when in need to discover new music.

      • bent@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Had the same issue, but between Bandcamp and Qobuz I find I’m not lacking much. Since I’m buying the songs anyway I don’t care too much about having multiple apps for my music.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Tidal might pay the most of streaming services (others in here are claiming it’s Qobuz) but Bandcamp pays the most to artists in general as the purchases pay much higher than streams. Bandcamp charge 15%, everything else goes to the band/label until they hit $5k in sales, and then Bandcamp’s fee drops to 10% and stays there for additional sales. If you wait to buy in bulk on ‘Bandcamp Fridays’, which happen about 10 times a year, the artists take 100% on those days.

        Imo Bandcamp is by far the best service for supporting artists.

        • bent@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can also buy music on Qobuz, I use it together with Bandcamp to get more coverage.

          • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Oh yes, true. I do forget. Their catalogue in Australia is quite pricey which doesn’t make them a very good value proposition here.

            For example Random Access Memories by Daft Punk is $27.09 for HiRes or $23.49 for CD resolution. I bought that album on physical CD from a brick and mortar store (JB HiFi) for $14.99. It was not on sale, that’s just a fairly standard price for a major release CD at the time - reissues of very popular releases are cheaper than that now.

            A more recent example, Igor by Tyler the Creator is $23.99 at physical stores, or on Qobuz is $27.59 for CD res or $31.79 for HiRes.

            (All these prices are in AUD).

            It does get cheaper with their ‘Sublime’ subscription but not to make it worth it (33%) - unless you were buying heaps of music off them, or already using their streaming.

    • bent@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I find that it’s really easy to find new artists and albums I like on Bandcamp. I just started by following a few genres and listen to a some music at random. If I like it I add it to my whislist and carry on. And I just listen to the “new and hot” section. Gives way better results and more variety than Spotify ever did for me.

      From time to time I go to my whislist and listen to some of it again and usually decide to either buy the album or delete it from my whislist.

      I also use Qobuz for more mainstream artists that’s not on Bandcamp.

      Recently started to put all my purchases into Jellyfin for easier management between the services.

      I also have a few pirated playlists of my favorite songs from years ago. I go through them when I have time and money and see if I like the songs enough to buy some albums or songs from the artists.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The best Russian music service ever was allofmp3. Sadly long gone but fondly remembered.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It was just a pirate server that charged for mp3s you realize, none of that money ever went to the artists.

      I never understood the appeal over Soulseek/emule (at the time).

      • arc99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Of course it was piracy but it was friction free piracy. Not just the price which was low but having a really cool webstore and client application. There was nothing that the music industry offered that was remotely comparable in terms of the convenience that allofmp3 offered at the time.

  • etherphon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Never used it because of the stupid name, which happens a lot, figures though. I’ll stick with Bandcamp.