• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I highly suspect he’s full of shit, too. Most likely, he counts all kinds of non-work activities as work, because he does them in an executive-ly capacity. And, in general, claiming you’re a hyper-optimised work machine is fashionable in Silicon Valley.

    • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You mean a lunch-business-meeting, a shit-business-meeting, a mastur… ok, I think I get the idea.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    You don’t see it about single fathers either. Why harp on a gender factor that isn’t relevant when the real issue is class and wealth disparity?

    • Siresly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re getting hung up on the gender of a hypothetical person brought up as an example in this one instance, where I can’t see why any result would be cause for consternation when, as you say, the focus here should be on the class factor.

      I assume the example here was a poor woman in order to maximize juxtaposition of the example versus the subject matter of the cited article, which is about a rich dude. Whatever the reason, this seems irrelevant.

    • Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolute facts, men are often ignored in this situation, were expected to be strong and handle everything by ourselves like we aren’t humans, someone’s child tryna figure what to do in life. The real enemy of the world is the class war and if we could realise that wed realise we are the 99%

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Only difference between this and a drug addict is the drug addict doesn’t generate value

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I question how much value this guy actually generates, too. Probably a normal amount for however many hours of work, but he and his immediate colleagues set the wages.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          To argue the value of the man is one thing, no CEO is worth a billion times more than their employee. However, my point is moreso that the destructive nature of an addicted individual is only tolerated depending on whether that person has a certain value tied to them.

          We would allow men like this to consume the world in favor of helping the drug addict.

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I dunno, we shouldn’t view people in terms of generating value, but rather in terms of needs.

        What the drug addict needs, is treatment. And this CEO needs a ton of it - to step down and foster a healthier work culture, where workplace democracy is present.

  • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    The most upsetting part of this is how little time he spends fearing for his fucking life while his buddies’ news stations print articles like this.

  • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    he cant even sit through a movie without thinking about his $4.2 trillion tech giant

    I’m so close to starting to feel sad for him

      • Frosty@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I need a Jira epic for “thinking about work” on my activity timeline.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          My uncle was told a long time ago if they went to lunch and talked about work at all to mark the hour as paid and he said he felt bad so didn’t. There is no way I’d not mark that these days.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wat a sad life.

    A mother who works two jobs and can’t sit through a movie without thinking about her kids is also sad, but at least she does it for something good

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cool I can’t do that without thinking about my job either. Thinking about your job isn’t work unless you fuckers want to start paying for it.

  • Ibuthyr@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    He works so much, he doesn’t even have time to find a new jacket. What a cringe lord.

  • razorcandy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    222
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s infuriating is that having no work-life balance is promoted as a positive. Sure there are people who are really devoted to their work and thrive on it, but that should be seen as voluntary and not expected. Working long hours also doesn’t necessarily mean you are working efficiently or using your full potential the entire time.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s meant to deify these CEOs. Gullible schmoes see this and think “well that makes sense, he spends every hour of his day working. That’s three times more than me! No wonder he makes a million times my salary! See, the only reason I’m not making billions is because I don’t have the divine skills and talent to work on my company all day.” (Or, “I choose to have a work-life balance cause I don’t mind making a little less money”)

      These CEOs have PR teams dedicated to slipping out stories like these so it keeps the CEO looking like a king.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also to convince gullible idiots to put in more hours and make more sacrifices because “that’s what it takes to make it to the top” not realizing that sacrificing your time and energy for a multi-billion dollar corporation won’t make you a billionaire. Rich people love the “hustle and grind” culture because it convinces people that if they just keep producing for the machine, the trickle down will finally come

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ugh. People wasting company time by thinking about their health and welfare and if they can afford their bills. When they should be thinking about the company. Won’t someone think of the profits. Theft. Theft all of it! Makes me so sick I have to take a mental health day away from checking my investments. /s /s /ssssssssss

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, having no work-life balance is different if you own a significant fraction of the company vs. if you’re on salary.

      Like, if Jensen Huang spends 12 hours over the weekend working on something for nVidia and increases the share price by 0.01% (with a $4.165 trillion market cap, this means it goes up $416 million), his personal net worth will go up by $14.7m. Not bad for a little weekend work.

      Let’s assume that someone who is on salary is on something absurd like $1m per year and gets a 500% bonus for working overtime. Their 12 hours of weekend work is going to net them $28k. That’s certainly nice, but it’s about 1/500th of what Huang gets. And, your average engineer probably doesn’t get overtime at all, and if they did it would be closer to $3k not $30k.

      If someone who owns a business wants to have a bad work-life balance, that’s one thing. But, it should never be expected of anybody who’s just on salary.

    • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      One of the perks of my job is that we have 50 hours a year in addition to our holidays that we can cash in whenever we need them.

      Everyone takes them, but my boss uses a handful each year, stays late every night, only uses half his holidays and loses the rest. I’ll never understand it.

      • razorcandy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s short-sighted not to realize that treating people with dignity will improve their motivation and productivity. My work also has a generous policy for time off, but my colleagues are still considerate when they use it by making sure the important things are done before they leave and that the rest of us will be able to handle things in their absence. There will always be a handful of people who abuse the privilege, but they need to be dealt with individually.

        From my observation, the types to work late and have no time off either take an immense satisfaction in working or are avoiding something to come home to.

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        50 hours??

        That ain’t even 10 days …

        I currently have at least 20 days, sometimes even 32 depending on the job.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes I understand that for some people out there, being a tech executive is their highest passion and true calling. But I hate it when those people turn around and expect everybody to act that way, and act like they’re just more virtuous for doing so. I have a very successful tech career but it’s a job, not my whole life. This society values money, so we keep asking rich people for life advice, as if they have tapped into something deeply human and universal. They haven’t.

    • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      And if its voluntary I would more likely categorize it as a hobby rather than work. I think we need a better definition for “work”. Work, to me, is an obligation. People work in order to feed and house themselves. So let’s says someone has $10mil. That is more than enough to easily live off the interest. I would say anyone at that level of wealth never actually works because they have the option to stop at any time, which in my mind makes it a hobby.

    • Booboofinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the Nvidia should get a life.i also agree 100%, if you are working every second of your waking hours then you are far from being efficient.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      As a researcher, a good chunk of my work is literally just sitting on my ass and thinking. Or thinking while taking a walk in the park, or thinking while mindlessly chopping wood in a video game. Now with a kid, it’s kind of switched to thinking about what to do for dinner, how I can get the chores done for the day or how to organize my time so that I can fit in a few hours of work. It’s work in the sense that it’s something that needs to be done and it has an energy cost to doing. It’s also not really something you can turn off even if you wanted to.

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was at some work dinner and talked to some guy i didn’t really know. He had a 2 year old child and said something like: “he knows that he and his wife work too much and they hardly see their child.” I gave him a look like: “that’s kinda sad.” But i think he misinterpreted it and said: “oh don’t worry, i’m not a guy who believes in WoRk LiFe BaLaNcE.” Like he was so close to say, i’m not woke or a fag, don’t worry.

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Sounds like the kind of shit one might say in a place where you need the money to feed that child and jobs are fire-at-will. What a fucking nightmare!

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        As a mechanical engineer I can’t really turn it off. It’s why I work yearly jobs and not hourly jobs. But it’s a cool job where I make things, not human drama.

  • hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Was there even an article to go with this headline, or do we just publish any off–hand remarks made by rich tech dudes now?

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It is a lie that CEO’s publicize about themselves. He has two children. If he actually was working 7 days a week from the moment he woke up he would have never had a chance to get married and have children- which is the life his workers lead.

    Musk used to brag about working 7 days a week one day, and the next day brag about how he never missed his children’s soccer games.

    • Cenotaph@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      2 days ago

      They don’t understand the actual concept of working. They think taking a call once in a while while out at a soiree counts entirely as work time.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Musk brags about working 100-hour weeks … while being the CEO of five companies. That means that at best being a CEO of one company is a 20-hour-a-week part time job.

    • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most are sociopaths who definitely do not think about other people, so it’s probably true that he does nothing else but think about the work. Eg Elon

    • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s because his work is thinking about how much money he could be making, not actually producing anything substantial. Those days are long gone