sanitation@lemmy.todayBanned from community to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square121linkfedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down17
arrow-up1392arrow-down1external-linkAI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?www.theguardian.comsanitation@lemmy.todayBanned from community to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square121linkfedilink
minus-squareDarkonion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down2·2 months agoIf someone sells you a knife that routinely fires bullets, then the company may have some complicity as with any misrepresented product.
minus-squareLilBobbyTables@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoBut in that analogy, the knife routinely asks you to confirm if you want to fire bullets or not. AI does nothing without people telling it what to do, and giving it permission to do it.
If someone sells you a knife that routinely fires bullets, then the company may have some complicity as with any misrepresented product.
But in that analogy, the knife routinely asks you to confirm if you want to fire bullets or not.
AI does nothing without people telling it what to do, and giving it permission to do it.