• minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because that’s how an open society with healthy exchanges of views works. Why are we even putting up with people trying to enforce their own insecurities on everyone else?

    • jafra@slrpnk.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Or: Because the overton window got moved far enough and privacy now is a privilege of wealth.

      • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Overton is an observation, not a force of influence. It isn’t why things are. We have no choice but to investigate and review whatever beliefs and values are within that window at any given time, given our ever changing world. To respond to an idea or belief with violence or censorship, instead of discussion, is to encourage tyranny. Bad ideas should be opposed by good ideas, not silenced due to some ppls discomfort with parts of our reality.

        • jafra@slrpnk.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Maybe i am a bit infuriated of the salami tactics, making privacy transgressions more and more frequent. Taking pictures after asking for permission is one thing, documenting an operation where only the operation area is in view might also be necessary.

          Infringing on patients privacy should be necessity-based, not by default. And the collected data should be protected as good as possible, not using some big data megacorps (that make their money off advertising or influencing people).

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      My right to privacy in a fucking doctor’s office is not an insecurity you ass