ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 天前Meet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1223arrow-down17
arrow-up1216arrow-down1imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 天前message-square33linkfedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·6 天前If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·6 天前3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 天前There’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.