gnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoSloupinfosec.pubimagemessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down140
arrow-up1575arrow-down1imageSloupinfosec.pubgnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square103linkfedilink
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·2 months agoThey didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoDoes that really make a difference?
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agoyes. normal usage works as expected
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoYes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.
They didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
Does that really make a difference?
yes. normal usage works as expected
Yes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.