• Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        Also, ironically, he means “I was being sarcastic”, not “I was being ironic”.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Got to love how this douche nozzle completely forgets that Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon fucking existed and what they were responsible for. (that’s not even mentioning that fuckstick Henry Killmonger)

      Oh yeah, there’s no chance that Lucas could have been thinking of America as the evil empire back in 1975… 🙄😒

      What a twat

    • Comet79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Fr? I always had the impression that the Empire was somewhat inspired by Nazi Germany and the rebels were the resistance. Some of the helmets imperials wear in SW are kinda sus.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think when it comes to text people need to just include something to denote sarcasm or irony. You can’t read tone properly in text. Books can add color in the form of adjectives but outside of silliness we don’t add something like “he/she quipped sarcastically” into our own comments.

      I think full adoption of the /s would be prudent for online discussions and comments with people that don’t know you personally.

      Although it would be hilarious to add “I said, dripping with sarcasm” to the end of statements.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You don’t need tone for sarcasm, because it can be inferred from context. Check out British (“dry”) sarcasm.

        Announcing your sarcasm is like explaining your joke. If you need to do it, you’ve failed, and it falls flat. At that point, it’s better to just not be sarcastic in the first place.

        • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          If you want to act like a dumbass even ironically, you don’t get to be mad at people treating you like a dumbass

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          There can be vast differences in reading comprehension and contextual tone recognition.

          As an easy example think of the many degrees of neurodivergency.

          Secondly, British sarcasm and indeed a lot of British communication in general comes from the intention to be deliberately vague, so as to bake plausible deniability in to the responses given.

          It can be inferred, but it’s not a guarantee.

          That being said this guy seems to just be a prick trying to walk back something that blew up in his face.

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m quite familiar. And in plain text it’s often lost on those that would benefit from understanding it. In some contexts it doesn’t matter. In others it does. Sometimes clarity is more important than whether or not it falls flat.

        • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          You don’t need tone for sarcasm, because it can be inferred from context. Check out British (“dry”) sarcasm.

          you’re being sarcastic here, right? /s