There’s no way they didn’t mean the layer of tp dust that comes from some extra soft brands of toilet paper.

While I don’t agree, your post is shittier than OPs

I’m not saying this dude is right for any of his actions, but also this comment is mega creepy.

Next up, we asked a shoe to write a haiku but it was beaten by a 30 year old HaikuMaker™®©.

This is like a food truck with extra steps.

Fake stuff? Next you’ll tell me that the dragons in that new How to Train Your Dragon movie aren’t really dragons.

Per this article, artificial sweeteners can create an insulin response in the body and can ultimately lead to some degree of insulin resistance. Though, they do state that more studies need to be performed.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7014832/

Remember when they named their voice assistant after a video game character?

'96 is often cited as the cutoff year for millennial, so they’d be mixed 29/30.

Don’t forget the, “I’m a very wealthy man”, televangelist who owns at least 3 personal jets.

It wouldn’t be lemmy if we weren’t always in a moral size measuring contest.

I don’t agree at all, the hype was evident, sure, but the procedural generation was largely the reason people didn’t like the game.

You stated that procedural generation isn’t hated, but ‘botching’ the usage of it at release is the piece that irrelevant. The people hated it because of the, admittably bad, procedural generation.

Local lemmy user offended on behalf of your sister for a joke told 10 years ago.

More at 11.

Like procedural generation, generative assets that are done well will be either indistinguishable from hand work, likely because there will be some involved, or will be incorporated in a way that they mesh well with everything else.

Everyone hated the procedural generation in no man’s sky, for example, until enough work was done to make that just a piece of the game.